Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 2, 2012·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Edmonton Oilers 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI114214119447
EDM09313519841

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:29CHIJamal MayersAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson, Marcus Kruger · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:40CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:22EDMTaylor HallAssists: Sam Gagner · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:26EDMSam GagnerAssists: Jordan Eberle, Andy Sutton · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:23EDMRyan WhitneyPPAssists: Sam Gagner · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:33CHIPatrick SharpSHAssists: Jonathan Toews, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:54EDMSam GagnerAssists: Ryan Whitney, Jordan Eberle · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:43EDMCam BarkerGWGAssists: Andy Sutton, Sam Gagner · Snap, 0.02 xG3–5
  9. P3 5:57CHIDave BollandAssists: Marcus Kruger, Andrew Shaw · Backhand, 0.28 xG4–5
  10. P3 6:25EDMSam GagnerAssists: Taylor Hall, Corey Potter · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–6
  11. P3 14:31EDMSam GagnerAssists: Jordan Eberle, Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–7
  12. P3 16:15EDMJordan EberleAssists: Sam Gagner, Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–8
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 13:08CHIDuncan Keith: Holding2 min
  2. P1 15:16CHIViktor Stalberg: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 17:52EDMBen Eager: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 2:40CHIBryan Bickell: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 8:02EDMCam Barker: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 10:31CHIBryan Bickell: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:25CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 18:26EDMLadislav Smid: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 6:56CHIDuncan Keith: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 9:52CHIPatrick Sharp: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horcoff won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIEDM
47Shots on goal41
4.7Expected goals3.8
78Shot attempts69
34Faceoffs won30
3Power plays7
14Penalty minutes6
10Hits13
19Blocked shots18
12Giveaways20
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBolland – Kruger – Shaw6:26

    xG 1.16–0.16 (88%)attempts 14–8goals 1–2

  2. Stalberg – Toews – Kane6:49

    xG 1.08–0.15 (88%)attempts 20–4goals 0–0

  3. Sharp – Toews – Kane2:45

    xG 0.57–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Morrison – Hossa – Sharp6:49

    xG 0.42–0.16 (72%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook14:29

    xG 1.39–0.30 (82%)attempts 29–12goals 1–1

  2. Hjalmarsson – Leddy9:26

    xG 1.53–0.95 (62%)attempts 16–17goals 1–3

  3. Keith – Leddy3:19

    xG 0.17–0.30 (35%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Smyth – Belanger – Jones2:31

    xG 0.11–0.06 (63%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Gagner – Eberle – Hall5:56

    xG 1.00–0.96 (51%)attempts 11–12goals 5–1

  3. Eager – Cornet – Lander2:33

    xG 0.04–0.11 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Eager – Petrell – Lander3:08

    xG 0.14–0.22 (39%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhitney – Potter10:21

    xG 0.72–0.60 (55%)attempts 14–14goals 2–1

  2. Sutton – Barker9:10

    xG 0.64–1.04 (38%)attempts 14–17goals 4–1

  3. Smid – Petry13:09

    xG 0.50–1.84 (22%)attempts 12–28goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.8 xGCHI 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #24 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.36 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).