Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 2, 2012·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Dallas Stars 2, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 83% of the time.

SJS winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL0714110221
SJS21521319537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:42SJSMichal HandzusAssists: Brent Burns, Jamie McGinn · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:32SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:41DALSteve OttPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:59SJSPatrick MarleauPPGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Logan Couture · Deflected, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:43SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Joe Pavelski · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:22DALJamie BennAssists: Philip Larsen, Steve Ott · Tip-in, 0.49 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:34SJSRyane CloweAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Snap, 0.26 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 16:12DALAlex Goligoski: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:40DALAdam Burish: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:40SJSBrent Burns: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 18:40DALAdam Burish: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 1:00DALSteve Ott: Holding2 min
  6. P2 4:58SJSBrent Burns: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 11:19SJSRyane Clowe: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 13:36DALVernon Fiddler: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P2 17:22DALEric Nystrom: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← DAL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Benn
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALSJS
21Shots on goal37
1.7Expected goals3.7
41Shot attempts73
12Faceoffs won40
2Power plays5
12Penalty minutes6
33Hits17
21Blocked shots11
14Giveaways7
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRyder – Ott – Benn11:07

    xG 0.84–0.45 (65%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  2. Dvorak – Fiddler – Nystrom10:37

    xG 0.05–0.93 (5%)attempts 4–20goals 0–1

  3. Morrow – Ribeiro – Eriksson12:03

    xG 0.17–1.06 (14%)attempts 6–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Larsen14:47

    xG 1.09–0.61 (64%)attempts 20–15goals 1–0

  2. Fistric – Goligoski2:24

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Daley – Fistric5:17

    xG 0.05–0.20 (18%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHandzus – Mitchell – McGinn9:43

    xG 0.52–0.10 (84%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Desjardins11:13

    xG 0.65–0.24 (73%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Clowe – Couture10:26

    xG 0.91–0.67 (58%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhite – Braun6:27

    xG 1.35–0.00 (100%)attempts 14–0goals 0–0

  2. Boyle – Vlasic11:45

    xG 0.62–0.21 (75%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Burns9:14

    xG 0.44–0.69 (39%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.7 xGDAL 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #562 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.86 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 83% of the time.

SJS winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).