Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 4, 2012·Pepsi Center, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 3, Colorado Avalanche 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 70% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN17010111011329
COL118112011050246

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:31VANRyan KeslerAssists: Alexander Edler, David Booth · Slap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:14COLDavid JonesPPAssists: Paul Stastny, Ryan O'Reilly · Slap, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:39COLJay McClementAssists: Daniel Winnik · Snap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:25VANKevin BieksaAssists: Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. COL Milan Hejduk stopped
  2. 2. VAN Maxim Lapierre stopped
  3. 3. COL Gabriel Landeskog stopped
  4. 4. VAN Mason Raymond scored
  5. 5. COL Ryan O'Reilly stopped
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 4:51COLTJ Galiardi: Elbowing2 min
  2. P1 8:46VANDavid Booth: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:46VANMason Raymond: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 16:42COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 16:42VANByron Bitz: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 19:32COLTJ Galiardi: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 13:20COLChuck Kobasew: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:46VANDan Hamhuis: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 3:02COLPaul Stastny: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 4:37VANAlexander Edler: Interference2 min
  11. P3 11:17COLDaniel Winnik: Holding2 min
  12. P3 13:56COLShane O'Brien: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 13:56VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
29Shots on goal46
2.7Expected goals4.0
60Shot attempts67
34Faceoffs won34
5Power plays4
15Penalty minutes17
13Hits16
12Blocked shots17
3Giveaways10
2Takeaways18

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Burrows – Kesler3:05

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Bitz – Booth – Hodgson2:36

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Kesler – Booth – Raymond7:20

    xG 0.29–0.29 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 1–1

  4. Bitz – Hansen – Hodgson4:02

    xG 0.17–0.18 (49%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Edler9:17

    xG 0.76–0.24 (76%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Ballard – Rome11:25

    xG 0.57–0.55 (51%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Bieksa13:45

    xG 0.09–0.60 (13%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestHejduk – O'Reilly – Landeskog9:45

    xG 0.42–0.16 (72%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. McClement – Winnik – Galiardi8:04

    xG 0.48–0.36 (57%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  3. Van Der Gulik – Porter – McLeod3:07

    xG 0.08–0.26 (25%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Kobasew – Jones – Stastny10:56

    xG 0.32–0.67 (32%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Byrne – Hejda12:26

    xG 0.23–0.14 (61%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  2. O'Brien – Hunwick12:49

    xG 0.72–0.70 (51%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Quincey – Johnson11:53

    xG 0.34–0.60 (36%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.0 xGVAN 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #290 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 70% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).