Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 6, 2012·Honda Center, Anaheim

Calgary Flames 2, Anaheim Ducks 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY0111619002226
ANA21101108033333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:52ANABobby RyanAssists: Lubomir Visnovsky, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:51ANAMatt BeleskeyAssists: Sheldon Brookbank, Teemu Selanne · Deflected, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:41CGYAlex TanguayAssists: Blair Jones, Scott Hannan · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:15CGYJarome IginlaPPAssists: Olli Jokinen, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Saku Koivu stopped
  2. 2. CGY Olli Jokinen scored
  3. 3. ANA Corey Perry scored
  4. 4. CGY Alex Tanguay stopped
  5. 5. ANA Teemu Selanne stopped
  6. 6. CGY Michael Cammalleri stopped
  7. 7. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  8. 8. CGY Jarome Iginla stopped
  9. 9. ANA Bobby Ryan scored
  10. 10. CGY Blair Jones scored
  11. 11. ANA Jason Blake stopped
  12. 12. CGY Krys Kolanos stopped
  13. 13. ANA Cam Fowler stopped
  14. 14. CGY TJ Brodie stopped
  15. 15. ANA Niklas Hagman scored
  16. 16. CGY Mikael Backlund stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:23ANACorey Perry: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P2 2:39CGYTom Kostopoulos: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 6:27CGYScott Hannan: Interference2 min
  4. P2 6:51CGYBlair Jones: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 10:03ANARyan Getzlaf: Interference2 min
  6. P2 10:03CGYMark Giordano: Diving2 min
  7. P3 2:40CGYTom Kostopoulos: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 2:40ANALuca Sbisa: Head butting5 min · PPG
  9. P3 2:40ANALuca Sbisa: Head butting10 min
  10. P3 14:33ANACam Fowler: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 16:03CGYKrys Kolanos: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
45% to win55% to win
← CGY attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYANA
26Shots on goal33
2.1Expected goals3.0
52Shot attempts71
23Faceoffs won33
4Power plays5
14Penalty minutes21
41Hits33
23Blocked shots14
12Giveaways13
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Jokinen – Tanguay10:56

    xG 0.68–0.21 (76%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  2. Cammalleri – Comeau – Jones3:48

    xG 0.10–0.07 (59%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Jokinen – Cammalleri2:50

    xG 0.01–0.02 (30%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Kolanos – Backlund – Bouma2:35

    xG 0.08–0.14 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Butler14:08

    xG 0.60–0.44 (58%)attempts 15–15goals 0–2

  2. Hannan – Giordano15:52

    xG 0.71–0.56 (56%)attempts 12–17goals 1–0

  3. Sarich – Brodie7:30

    xG 0.07–0.47 (12%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestBlake – Cogliano – Bonino10:14

    xG 0.86–0.33 (72%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  2. Hagman – Parros – Pelley4:30

    xG 0.23–0.04 (84%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  3. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan12:13

    xG 0.21–0.18 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  4. Selanne – Koivu – Beleskey10:53

    xG 0.22–0.58 (27%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Fowler14:15

    xG 0.78–0.25 (76%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Visnovsky – Sbisa7:35

    xG 0.30–0.04 (87%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  3. Lydman – Brookbank12:27

    xG 0.27–0.21 (57%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.0 xGCGY 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #310 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).