Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 7, 2012·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Vancouver Canucks 4, Nashville Predators 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN31106012022431
NSH11621209031340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:42VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Dan Hamhuis · Snap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:47NSHColin WilsonAssists: David Legwand, Patric Hornqvist · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:21VANByron BitzAssists: Henrik Sedin, Kevin Bieksa · Slap, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:44VANDaniel SedinAssists: Byron Bitz, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:14NSHSergei KostitsynAssists: Kevin Klein, Martin Erat · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 5:16NSHMike FisherAssists: Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Mason Raymond stopped
  2. 2. NSH Sergei Kostitsyn stopped
  3. 3. VAN Ryan Kesler stopped
  4. 4. NSH Martin Erat stopped
  5. 5. VAN Alexandre Burrows scored
  6. 6. NSH David Legwand scored
  7. 7. VAN Daniel Sedin stopped
  8. 8. NSH Mike Fisher stopped
  9. 9. VAN Cody Hodgson stopped
  10. 10. NSH Ryan Ellis stopped
  11. 11. VAN Alexander Edler scored
  12. 12. NSH Colin Wilson stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 4:57VANCody Hodgson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:12NSHBrandon Yip: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:19VANDavid Booth: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 8:46VANAaron Rome: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 18:22VANAlexandre Burrows: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANNSH
31Shots on goal40
2.2Expected goals3.5
57Shot attempts63
32Faceoffs won29
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
12Hits20
11Blocked shots13
4Giveaways15
10Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Bitz3:49

    xG 0.33–0.03 (92%)attempts 4–2goals 2–0

  2. Burrows – Kesler – Booth3:44

    xG 0.39–0.10 (79%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows2:49

    xG 0.08–0.01 (89%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Hansen – Raymond – Hodgson2:41

    xG 0.10–0.04 (73%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBallard – Rome12:57

    xG 0.74–0.49 (60%)attempts 17–13goals 0–1

  2. Hamhuis – Bieksa18:25

    xG 0.58–0.57 (50%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Salo – Edler15:59

    xG 0.54–0.86 (38%)attempts 12–14goals 2–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Wilson9:50

    xG 0.65–0.20 (76%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Fisher – Erat – Kostitsyn12:32

    xG 0.65–0.51 (56%)attempts 13–12goals 2–0

  3. Smithson – Halischuk – Smith6:24

    xG 0.13–0.17 (43%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Tootoo – Yip – Spaling7:50

    xG 0.01–0.22 (6%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlein – Josi13:29

    xG 0.82–0.49 (63%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Weber18:28

    xG 0.78–0.74 (51%)attempts 17–13goals 2–0

  3. Bouillon – Ellis10:17

    xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.5 xGVAN 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #234 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).