Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 11, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Winnipeg Jets 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG21014211525
PIT214315310839

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:17WPGKyle WellwoodAssists: Toby Enstrom, Dustin Byfuglien · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:04WPGAlexander BurmistrovAssists: Antti Miettinen, Tim Stapleton · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:11PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Jordan Staal, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:42PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 3:12PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Marc-Andre Fleury · Snap, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 9:53PITKris LetangAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P2 14:19WPGTim StapletonAssists: Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:08PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Chris Kunitz, James Neal · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–5
  9. P3 4:35WPGDustin ByfuglienAssists: Bryan Little, Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–5
  10. P3 4:54PITRichard ParkGWGAssists: Brooks Orpik, Craig Adams · Tip-in, 0.04 xG4–6
  11. P3 7:48PITJordan StaalAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–7
  12. P3 10:02WPGBryan LittleAssists: Ron Hainsey, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.13 xG5–7
  13. P3 17:16PITKris LetangPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.35 xG5–8
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 17:54PITKris Letang: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P2 2:01WPGChris Thorburn: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 11:33WPGToby Enstrom: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 16:57WPGAndrew Ladd: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← WPG attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Little
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGPIT
25Shots on goal39
2.3Expected goals2.8
51Shot attempts56
31Faceoffs won35
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
24Hits29
7Blocked shots21
3Giveaways2
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestThorburn – Slater – Glass9:23

    xG 0.54–0.30 (64%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little14:53

    xG 0.70–0.65 (52%)attempts 19–9goals 2–3

  3. Miettinen – Stapleton – Burmistrov8:26

    xG 0.16–0.12 (57%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  4. Antropov – Wellwood – Kane13:42

    xG 0.29–0.64 (31%)attempts 13–12goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Bogosian16:39

    xG 1.42–0.67 (68%)attempts 25–13goals 2–1

  2. Oduya – Stuart15:41

    xG 0.24–0.34 (41%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Enstrom – Byfuglien17:09

    xG 0.35–0.82 (30%)attempts 10–19goals 2–4

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestPark – Adams – Vitale7:16

    xG 0.42–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–1goals 1–0

  2. Sullivan – O'Reilly – Jeffrey7:31

    xG 0.36–0.43 (46%)attempts 11–11goals 0–2

  3. Cooke – Dupuis – Staal12:04

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 7–11goals 1–2

  4. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal12:25

    xG 0.75–1.04 (42%)attempts 11–15goals 3–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Niskanen12:01

    xG 0.64–0.27 (70%)attempts 15–8goals 0–2

  2. Orpik – Letang20:00

    xG 0.88–0.68 (56%)attempts 13–21goals 4–1

  3. Martin – Michalek18:01

    xG 0.60–0.74 (45%)attempts 18–12goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.8 xGWPG 2.3 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #88 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).