Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 14, 2012·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

St. Louis Blues 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL11205015132
CBJ16011116233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:51STLDavid BackesSHAssists: David Perron · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:59CBJJames WisniewskiPPAssists: Mark Letestu, Jeff Carter · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P3 6:49CBJDerek DorsettGWGAssists: Samuel Pahlsson, Antoine Vermette · Backhand, 0.18 xG1–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:47CBJDerek Dorsett: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:09CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 15:09STLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P1 18:14STLBarret Jackman: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 6:57CBJDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 6:57STLDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 10:42STLDavid Backes: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 3:52STLCarlo Colaiacovo: Holding2 min
  9. P3 16:16STLT.J. Oshie: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← STL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Umberger won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCBJ
32Shots on goal33
2.8Expected goals2.6
59Shot attempts57
35Faceoffs won25
1Power plays4
15Penalty minutes9
23Hits26
10Blocked shots16
2Giveaways5
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLangenbrunner – Porter – Sobotka8:39

    xG 0.54–0.19 (74%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. McDonald – Backes – Oshie4:23

    xG 0.33–0.09 (78%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Backes – Oshie – Perron9:34

    xG 0.45–0.46 (49%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  4. McDonald – Stewart – Berglund7:29

    xG 0.17–0.21 (44%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Pietrangelo17:06

    xG 0.83–0.51 (62%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  2. Jackman – Shattenkirk12:40

    xG 0.42–0.35 (55%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Polak – Russell9:58

    xG 0.34–0.46 (42%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestPahlsson – Vermette – Dorsett8:29

    xG 0.58–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  2. Prospal – Carter – Letestu9:07

    xG 0.32–0.17 (66%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. MacKenzie – Russell – Gillies7:46

    xG 0.09–0.25 (27%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Umberger – Nash – Brassard11:57

    xG 0.27–0.47 (37%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWisniewski – Moore15:15

    xG 1.07–0.70 (60%)attempts 22–13goals 1–0

  2. Clitsome – Savard11:32

    xG 0.03–0.29 (9%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Johnson16:25

    xG 0.11–0.85 (11%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.6 xGSTL 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #933 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).