Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 16, 2012·Madison Square Garden, New York

Chicago Blackhawks 4, New York Rangers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 51% of the time.

NYR winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI4100903422
NYR0517112224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:05CHIJonathan ToewsUnassisted · Snap, 0.41 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:07CHINick LeddyAssists: Marian Hossa, Brent Seabrook · Slap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P1 4:00CHIPatrick SharpGWGAssists: Jonathan Toews · Snap, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P1 9:38CHIMarian HossaAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Snap, 0.15 xG4–0
  5. P2 3:04NYRMarc StaalAssists: Steve Eminger, Mike Rupp · Slap, 0.03 xG4–1
  6. P3 15:15NYRCarl HagelinAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Ryan Callahan · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:05NYRDan Girardi: Penalty shot covering puck in crease0 min
  2. P1 5:18CHIJohn Scott: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 5:18CHIJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 5:18CHIAndrew Shaw: Holding2 min
  5. P1 5:18NYRMike Rupp: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 13:33CHISean O'Donnell: Interference2 min
  7. P2 5:34CHIViktor Stalberg: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P2 8:06CHIJonathan Toews: Interference2 min
  9. P2 8:33NYRBrad Richards: Holding the stick2 min
  10. P2 9:21NYRBrandon Dubinsky: Elbowing2 min
  11. P2 9:21NYRBrandon Dubinsky: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 12:45CHIAndrew Brunette: Too many men on the ice2 min
  13. P3 5:47CHISean O'Donnell: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Boyle won the faceoff against Bolland
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINYR
22Shots on goal24
2.9Expected goals2.9
46Shot attempts48
23Faceoffs won26
3Power plays7
16Penalty minutes8
14Hits32
13Blocked shots17
0Giveaways5
9Takeaways0

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Toews – Kane8:55

    xG 0.35–0.30 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Bolland – Bickell – Stalberg6:57

    xG 0.03–0.11 (21%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Brunette – Hossa – Kruger9:23

    xG 0.28–0.76 (27%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook2:37

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Seabrook – Leddy15:05

    xG 0.51–0.54 (49%)attempts 12–10goals 2–1

  3. O'Donnell – Lepisto6:47

    xG 0.03–0.37 (7%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – Callahan – Hagelin8:20

    xG 0.67–0.26 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Dubinsky – Prust7:06

    xG 0.39–0.14 (73%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  3. Boyle – Prust – Hagelin2:24

    xG 0.07–0.15 (34%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Gaborik – Anisimov – Stepan8:09

    xG 0.12–0.34 (26%)attempts 4–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Del Zotto9:43

    xG 0.76–0.28 (73%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  2. Staal – Del Zotto2:20

    xG 0.04–0.07 (36%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Eminger – Staal7:05

    xG 0.01–0.07 (7%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 2.9 xGCHI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #458 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 51% of the time.

NYR winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).