Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 16, 2012·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

San Jose Sharks 5, Tampa Bay Lightning 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 82% of the time.

TBL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS1173201805550
TBL213142711625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:16SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:30TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Brendan Mikkelson, Steve Downie · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:35TBLTeddy PurcellPPAssists: Brendan Mikkelson, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:44SJSMichal HandzusAssists: Jamie McGinn, Torrey Mitchell · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:08TBLSteve DownieAssists: Eric Brewer, Victor Hedman · Slap, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:37SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: Tommy Wingels, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P2 15:44SJSColin WhiteAssists: Jamie McGinn, Torrey Mitchell · Wrist, 0.29 xG4–3
  8. P3 2:44TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Victor Hedman, Ryan Malone · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:01TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–5
  10. P3 14:50SJSTommy WingelsAssists: Logan Couture, Dan Boyle · Snap, 0.06 xG5–5
  11. OT 4:27TBLMartin St. LouisGWGAssists: Victor Hedman, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.13 xG5–6
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 0:26TBLVictor Hedman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:20TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:26SJSRyane Clowe: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:34TBLTom Pyatt: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSTBL
50Shots on goal25
4.4Expected goals2.2
76Shot attempts43
36Faceoffs won30
3Power plays1
2Penalty minutes6
22Hits26
12Blocked shots10
7Giveaways7
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHandzus – Mitchell – McGinn10:57

    xG 1.22–0.49 (72%)attempts 14–10goals 2–2

  2. Clowe – Couture – Wingels15:38

    xG 0.80–0.24 (77%)attempts 21–6goals 2–0

  3. Thornton – Marleau – Pavelski14:52

    xG 0.48–0.14 (78%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Winchester – Desjardins – McCarthy3:21

    xG 0.07–0.45 (14%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhite – Vlasic3:37

    xG 0.67–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Burns – Braun6:38

    xG 0.58–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  3. Boyle – Vlasic8:20

    xG 0.76–0.55 (58%)attempts 11–5goals 2–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – Pyatt – Purcell3:57

    xG 0.16–0.06 (73%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos3:02

    xG 0.08–0.06 (60%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Shannon2:04

    xG 0.09–0.19 (33%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Stamkos2:31

    xG 0.00–0.14 (2%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Hedman22:01

    xG 0.96–0.71 (58%)attempts 19–15goals 2–0

  2. Gervais – Mikkelson14:01

    xG 0.41–0.64 (39%)attempts 10–16goals 1–1

  3. Clark – Gilroy13:58

    xG 0.13–1.12 (10%)attempts 5–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.2 xGSJS 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #11 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.16 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 82% of the time.

TBL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).