Fri, Feb 17, 2012·RBC Center, Raleigh
San Jose Sharks 2, Carolina Hurricanes 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 53% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJS | 06 | 013 | 218 | 237 |
| CAR | 27 | 012 | 16 | 325 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 7:31CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Jussi Jokinen · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
- P1 10:34CARJustin FaulkPPAssists: Jiri Tlusty, Eric Staal · Snap, 0.23 xG0–2
- P3 1:26SJSDan BoyleUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
- P3 3:52SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Dominic Moore, Ryane Clowe · Snap, 0.05 xG2–2
- P3 11:55CARJussi JokinenGWGAssists: Jamie McBain, Drayson Bowman · Deflected, 0.08 xG2–3
Penalties (5)
- P1 9:45SJSJamie McGinn: Roughing2 min · PPG
- P1 14:21SJSThomas Greiss: Hooking2 min
- P2 2:46CARJaroslav Spacek: Hooking2 min
- P2 2:46SJSTommy Wingels: Diving2 min
- P2 18:05CARJerome Samson: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Sutter won the faceoff against Thornton
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestMoore – Clowe – Ferriero7:22
xG 0.58–0.21 (73%)attempts 12–5goals 2–1
- McGinn – Couture – Wingels9:00
xG 0.36–0.20 (64%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
- Handzus – Desjardins – Ferriero2:48
xG 0.11–0.01 (89%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Handzus – Mitchell – Desjardins3:38
xG 0.14–0.06 (71%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestVandermeer – Braun6:51
xG 0.25–0.02 (92%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0
- Boyle – Burns2:35
xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0
- Vandermeer – Vlasic4:34
xG 0.19–0.01 (96%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestDwyer – Nodl – Sutter13:30
xG 0.75–0.39 (66%)attempts 8–18goals 0–0
- Staal – Tlusty – Samson11:40
xG 0.38–0.22 (64%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0
- Jokinen – Bowman – Skinner11:28
xG 0.32–0.70 (31%)attempts 9–17goals 2–1
Defence pairs
- bestAllen – Gleason13:23
xG 0.73–0.23 (76%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0
- Harrison – Faulk14:58
xG 0.53–0.54 (49%)attempts 18–15goals 1–0
- Spacek – McBain11:17
xG 0.28–0.65 (30%)attempts 8–18goals 1–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 53% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CAR − SJS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).