Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 18, 2012·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1728315630
PHI21311018431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:17PITMatt CookeUnassisted · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:16PHIJaromir JagrAssists: Daniel Brière · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:34PHIJaromir JagrPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:14PITJordan StaalSHAssists: Craig Adams · Snap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:57PITMatt CookeSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:41PHIEric WellwoodUnassisted · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–3
  7. P3 0:37PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–3
  8. P3 2:09PITPascal DupuisGWGAssists: Jordan Staal, Steve Sullivan · Snap, 0.18 xG5–3
  9. P3 9:02PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Backhand, 0.07 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:41PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: James van Riemsdyk · Backhand, 0.12 xG6–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:07PHIBraydon Coburn: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 14:03PITCraig Adams: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:18PHIWayne Simmonds: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P1 15:21PITJordan Staal: Holding2 min
  5. P1 19:58PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 4:51PITPaul Martin: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 7:52PITJoe Vitale: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 9:56PITJordan Staal: Boarding2 min
  9. P2 9:56PHIKimmo Timonen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 11:32PHINicklas Grossmann: Holding2 min
  11. P2 14:58PITPascal Dupuis: Tripping2 min
  12. P2 15:31PITBrooks Orpik: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 17:57PHIScott Hartnell: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 17:57PITJoe Vitale: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
30Shots on goal31
3.3Expected goals2.3
59Shot attempts54
34Faceoffs won26
3Power plays6
24Penalty minutes20
39Hits37
11Blocked shots14
6Giveaways15
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestSullivan – Dupuis – Staal5:56

    xG 0.77–0.03 (96%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Asham – Cooke – Jeffrey6:25

    xG 0.69–0.18 (80%)attempts 8–4goals 2–1

  3. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal8:45

    xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

  4. Park – Adams – Vitale5:35

    xG 0.03–0.14 (17%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Letang10:33

    xG 1.49–0.10 (94%)attempts 17–7goals 3–0

  2. Michalek – Niskanen8:30

    xG 0.56–0.36 (61%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  3. Engelland – Letang2:01

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestTalbot – Wellwood – Couturier9:41

    xG 0.36–0.08 (82%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek10:11

    xG 0.21–0.63 (25%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  3. Jagr – Brière – Read8:09

    xG 0.10–0.65 (13%)attempts 5–8goals 0–2

  4. van Riemsdyk – Simmonds – Schenn8:07

    xG 0.22–0.84 (21%)attempts 6–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Carle3:01

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Grossmann3:51

    xG 0.19–0.16 (55%)attempts 1–6goals 1–0

  3. Meszaros – Grossmann10:23

    xG 0.15–0.37 (29%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.3 xGPIT 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #58 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).