Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 21, 2012·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

San Jose Sharks 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS018212111341
CBJ41516114635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:55CBJR.J. UmbergerAssists: Grant Clitsome, Derick Brassard · Wrist, 0.40 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:51CBJJeff CarterPPAssists: Vinny Prospal, Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:18CBJRick NashAssists: Derick Brassard, R.J. Umberger · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:30CBJJeff CarterPPGWGAssists: Vinny Prospal, David Savard · Deflected, 0.15 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:11SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Colin White, Andrew Desjardins · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P2 5:37SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Michal Handzus, Justin Braun · Snap, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P2 10:59CBJDavid SavardPPAssists: Nikita Nikitin, Antoine Vermette · Slap, 0.04 xG2–5
  8. P3 1:26CBJJeff CarterAssists: Rick Nash, Vinny Prospal · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–6
  9. P3 8:35SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Dan Boyle · Deflected, 0.09 xG3–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 6:23SJSJoe Pavelski: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:52CBJColton Gillies: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:44SJSRyane Clowe: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 17:44CBJR.J. Umberger: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:44SJSTommy Wingels: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:15CBJRick Nash: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 7:37SJSRyane Clowe: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 7:37SJSRyane Clowe: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 1:48SJSColin White: Elbowing2 min
  10. P3 7:56CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 12:32SJSMichal Handzus: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 15:17CBJColton Gillies: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 19:38SJSBrad Winchester: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCBJ
41Shots on goal35
2.8Expected goals2.7
60Shot attempts52
34Faceoffs won34
4Power plays7
19Penalty minutes13
17Hits15
10Blocked shots10
3Giveaways6
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Marleau – Pavelski4:56

    xG 0.53–0.06 (89%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Desjardins2:00

    xG 0.23–0.05 (82%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Handzus – Winchester – Desjardins2:12

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Handzus – Desjardins – McGinn2:01

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhite – Boyle4:08

    xG 0.45–0.05 (90%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Boyle – Burns5:11

    xG 0.41–0.03 (93%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. White – Vlasic8:25

    xG 0.32–0.07 (81%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Nash – Brassard10:04

    xG 0.77–0.41 (65%)attempts 5–15goals 2–1

  2. MacKenzie – Gillies – Johansen7:55

    xG 0.22–0.40 (35%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  3. Prospal – Carter – Letestu8:44

    xG 0.22–0.67 (25%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  4. Pahlsson – Vermette – Dorsett9:34

    xG 0.12–0.59 (16%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClitsome – Savard11:41

    xG 0.91–0.41 (69%)attempts 11–11goals 3–1

  2. Lebda – Moore16:14

    xG 0.44–1.00 (30%)attempts 13–21goals 0–1

  3. Tyutin – Nikitin13:12

    xG 0.12–0.84 (12%)attempts 6–22goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.7 xGSJS 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #358 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.70 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).