Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 23, 2012·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Vancouver Canucks 4, Detroit Red Wings 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 64% of the time.

DET winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN01718213051443
DET15015212040336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:16DETDarren HelmUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 13:34VANDaniel SedinAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P3 6:08DETKyle QuinceyAssists: Justin Abdelkader, Darren Helm · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:26VANCody HodgsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:46DETJustin AbdelkaderAssists: Darren Helm, Drew Miller · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:44VANDaniel SedinAssists: Henrik Sedin, Ryan Kesler · Slap, 0.05 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Jiri Hudler stopped
  2. 2. VAN David Booth stopped
  3. 3. DET Henrik Zetterberg stopped
  4. 4. VAN Alexander Edler stopped
  5. 5. DET Todd Bertuzzi stopped
  6. 6. VAN Alexandre Burrows scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:13VANMaxim Lapierre: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 6:49DETJustin Abdelkader: Interference2 min
  3. P1 13:16VANDaniel Sedin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P1 16:58VANDavid Booth: Holding2 min
  5. P2 3:35DETKyle Quincey: Interference2 min
  6. P2 6:52DETKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 13:12DETDrew Miller: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 13:18VANRyan Kesler: Interference2 min
  9. P2 14:19VANDan Hamhuis: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANDET
43Shots on goal36
2.8Expected goals3.7
65Shot attempts52
36Faceoffs won31
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
11Hits25
9Blocked shots9
5Giveaways8
10Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows10:20

    xG 0.48–0.24 (66%)attempts 13–5goals 0–1

  2. Malhotra – Lapierre – Weise5:20

    xG 0.08–0.10 (45%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Kesler – Booth – Raymond9:44

    xG 0.16–0.50 (25%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Hansen – Hodgson6:16

    xG 0.43–0.99 (30%)attempts 11–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Edler12:48

    xG 0.49–0.27 (64%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

  2. Rome – Tanev12:42

    xG 0.80–1.01 (44%)attempts 16–15goals 1–2

  3. Hamhuis – Bieksa12:15

    xG 0.39–0.63 (39%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestBertuzzi – Zetterberg – Franzen10:19

    xG 0.99–0.39 (72%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Cleary – Filppula – Hudler10:37

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Holmstrom – Emmerton – Mursak4:28

    xG 0.10–0.08 (54%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Miller – Abdelkader – Helm10:35

    xG 0.79–0.83 (49%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEricsson – Quincey8:36

    xG 0.99–0.50 (66%)attempts 11–10goals 2–0

  2. Stuart – Ericsson3:41

    xG 0.76–0.37 (67%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Stuart – Kronwall9:47

    xG 0.53–0.24 (69%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.7 xGVAN 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #50 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.86 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 64% of the time.

DET winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).