Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 25, 2012·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Colorado Avalanche 4, Detroit Red Wings 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

DET winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL26110111427
DET07010314331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:35COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Steve Downie, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:42COLDavid JonesSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:35COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Steve Downie · Snap, 0.16 xG3–0
  4. P3 0:44DETJiri HudlerPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Henrik Zetterberg · Snap, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:13COLSteve DownieGWGAssists: Ryan Wilson, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–1
  6. P3 13:22DETJiri HudlerAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Brad Stuart · Tip-in, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 14:53DETValtteri FilppulaAssists: Jiri Hudler, Henrik Zetterberg · Wrist, 0.41 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:01COLMark Olver: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 14:36DETTomas Holmstrom: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 18:33DETJiri Hudler: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 6:42COLMark Olver: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 19:41COLTJ Galiardi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 11:45COLRyan Wilson: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 11:45DETJustin Abdelkader: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
45% to win55% to win
← COL attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLDET
27Shots on goal31
2.6Expected goals2.0
41Shot attempts52
22Faceoffs won30
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
27Hits25
11Blocked shots10
5Giveaways5
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestDownie – O'Reilly – Landeskog12:47

    xG 1.42–0.38 (79%)attempts 18–10goals 3–0

  2. Kobasew – McClement – McLeod5:55

    xG 0.01–0.04 (20%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Jones – Winnik – Olver9:26

    xG 0.29–0.34 (46%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Stastny – Galiardi – Duchene11:06

    xG 0.25–0.43 (37%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Wilson4:14

    xG 0.59–0.22 (73%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Hejda – Hunwick5:14

    xG 0.25–0.05 (83%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Hunwick – Wilson3:21

    xG 0.19–0.02 (90%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterberg – Filppula – Hudler5:32

    xG 0.80–0.30 (73%)attempts 8–3goals 2–0

  2. Holmstrom – Emmerton – Mursak8:52

    xG 0.22–0.04 (83%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Bertuzzi – Cleary – Abdelkader2:31

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Cleary – Filppula – Hudler5:17

    xG 0.11–0.12 (48%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Quincey6:19

    xG 0.67–0.29 (70%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Lidstrom – Stuart7:39

    xG 0.39–0.14 (73%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Lidstrom – Kronwall2:19

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 2.0 xGCOL 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #352 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

DET winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).