Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 29, 2012·United Center, Chicago

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 50% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR31007117434
CHI211212112535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59TORTyler BozakAssists: Joffrey Lupul · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:01CHIAndrew ShawAssists: Bryan Bickell, Dave Bolland · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:29TORJoffrey LupulPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Dion Phaneuf · Tip-in, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:53TORClarke MacArthurAssists: Mikhail Grabovski, Cody Franson · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–1
  5. P1 19:30CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Nick Leddy, Duncan Keith · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 8:33CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Andrew Brunette, Sami Lepisto · Backhand, 0.24 xG3–3
  7. P2 12:06CHIMarian HossaAssists: Patrick Kane, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:44CHIMarian HossaENGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.69 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:56TORMike BrownAssists: Joey Crabb, David Steckel · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:33TORJoffrey Lupul: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:09CHIPatrick Sharp: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:32CHIAndrew Shaw: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 4:32TORLuke Schenn: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 4:32CHIAndrew Shaw: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 14:03CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 14:03TORLuke Schenn: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 6:02CHIPatrick Kane: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 11:09TORTim Connolly: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← TOR attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kane won the faceoff against Grabovski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORCHI
34Shots on goal35
3.9Expected goals3.9
64Shot attempts55
31Faceoffs won24
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
25Hits17
9Blocked shots20
3Giveaways9
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestSteckel – Crabb – Brown6:06

    xG 0.25–0.16 (60%)attempts 4–3goals 1–1

  2. Lupul – Kessel – Bozak12:37

    xG 0.54–0.55 (50%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  3. MacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin11:12

    xG 0.37–0.51 (42%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  4. Connolly – Armstrong – Frattin9:07

    xG 0.14–0.51 (21%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLiles – Franson9:56

    xG 0.45–0.20 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  2. Liles – Schenn3:31

    xG 0.09–0.07 (57%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Gardiner8:30

    xG 0.27–0.28 (50%)attempts 11–7goals 0–2

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Hossa – Kane13:25

    xG 1.36–0.56 (71%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  2. Mayers – Hayes – Bollig3:45

    xG 0.13–0.10 (57%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Bolland – Bickell – Shaw9:53

    xG 0.47–0.45 (51%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  4. Sharp – Stalberg – Kruger10:02

    xG 0.30–0.42 (42%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Leddy11:40

    xG 0.95–0.42 (70%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook14:42

    xG 1.04–0.60 (63%)attempts 17–19goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Leddy9:01

    xG 0.38–0.35 (52%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.9 xGTOR 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #156 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.72 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 50% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).