Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 29, 2012·Rexall Place, Edmonton

St. Louis Blues 5, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 70% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL18211212531
EDM0721106224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59STLAndy McDonaldAssists: T.J. Oshie, David Backes · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:05STLScott NicholAssists: David Perron, Kevin Shattenkirk · Slap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:34STLAndy McDonaldGWGAssists: T.J. Oshie, Kevin Shattenkirk · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:48EDMCorey PotterAssists: Darcy Hordichuk · Slap, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:12EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Taylor Hall, Nick Schultz · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:28STLKevin ShattenkirkPPAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Jason Arnott · Tip-in, 0.20 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:54STLChris StewartUnassisted · Wrist, 0.41 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 14:48STLRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 14:48EDMDarcy Hordichuk: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 3:14EDMSam Gagner: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 9:06STLRyan Reaves: Holding2 min
  5. P2 13:24EDMRyan Smyth: Checking from behind5 min
  6. P2 13:24EDMRyan Smyth: Game misconduct10 min
  7. P2 19:52EDMBen Eager: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 19:52STLBarret Jackman: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 2:25EDMCam Barker: Slashing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 7:54EDMTaylor Hall: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  11. P3 14:43EDMCorey Potter: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← STL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horcoff won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLEDM
31Shots on goal24
3.1Expected goals1.9
52Shot attempts41
26Faceoffs won22
4Power plays1
9Penalty minutes28
23Hits15
10Blocked shots7
15Giveaways20
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestArnott – Porter – Sobotka6:46

    xG 0.56–0.08 (88%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  2. Nichol – Crombeen – Reaves3:52

    xG 0.16–0.07 (70%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. McDonald – Backes – Oshie11:00

    xG 0.49–0.60 (45%)attempts 8–9goals 2–1

  4. Stewart – Berglund – Perron10:04

    xG 0.07–0.44 (14%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Shattenkirk11:48

    xG 0.59–0.17 (78%)attempts 15–8goals 3–0

  2. Colaiacovo – Pietrangelo11:35

    xG 0.69–0.32 (68%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  3. Jackman – Polak2:29

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHemsky – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins11:28

    xG 0.99–0.54 (65%)attempts 16–8goals 1–3

  2. Belanger – Gagner – Eberle3:08

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Belanger – Hordichuk – Petrell3:58

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  4. Smyth – Gagner – Eberle5:52

    xG 0.05–0.18 (22%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Whitney13:04

    xG 0.63–0.10 (86%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Whitney – Petry2:17

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Potter – Barker9:48

    xG 0.36–0.42 (46%)attempts 12–9goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 1.9 xGSTL 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #349 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 70% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).