Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 1, 2012·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Florida Panthers 0, Winnipeg Jets 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 85% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0701709033
WPG21308511732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:01WPGEvander KaneGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:03WPGJim SlaterAssists: Mark Stuart, Chris Thorburn · Wrist, 0.30 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:49WPGKyle WellwoodAssists: Mark Stuart, Evander Kane · Deflected, 0.20 xG0–3
  4. P3 4:35WPGBryan LittleAssists: Blake Wheeler, Randy Jones · Snap, 0.27 xG0–4
  5. P3 8:06WPGNik AntropovPPAssists: Zach Bogosian, Toby Enstrom · Slap, 0.48 xG0–5
  6. P3 8:18WPGEvander KaneAssists: Kyle Wellwood, Alexander Burmistrov · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–6
  7. P3 17:58WPGBlake WheelerAssists: Evander Kane, Tim Stapleton · Backhand, 0.43 xG0–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:30FLATomas Fleischmann: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 3:56WPGTim Stapleton: Hooking2 min
  3. P3 6:46FLAEd Jovanovski: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P3 10:51WPGMark Stuart: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 10:51WPGMark Stuart: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 10:51FLAErik Gudbranson: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 10:51WPGMark Stuart: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 15:21WPGNik Antropov: Holding2 min
  9. P3 19:21FLAErik Gudbranson: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
45% to win55% to win
← FLA attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Little won the faceoff against Goc
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAWPG
33Shots on goal32
3.2Expected goals5.8
61Shot attempts57
25Faceoffs won20
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes18
27Hits30
15Blocked shots16
12Giveaways5
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestGoc – Fleischmann – Wolski5:46

    xG 0.50–0.34 (60%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  2. Kopecky – Goc – Fleischmann3:42

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Sturm – Santorelli – Matthias4:19

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Samuelsson – Kopecky – Goc3:18

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Campbell – Garrison16:06

    xG 1.19–1.15 (51%)attempts 23–13goals 0–0

  2. Weaver – Ellerby12:56

    xG 0.14–0.59 (19%)attempts 3–13goals 0–2

  3. Jovanovski – Gudbranson11:51

    xG 0.80–1.59 (34%)attempts 14–13goals 0–3

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Wheeler – Little12:14

    xG 1.58–0.75 (68%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. Wellwood – Kane – Burmistrov9:48

    xG 0.74–0.27 (74%)attempts 6–5goals 3–0

  3. Antropov – Miettinen – Stapleton7:28

    xG 0.40–0.35 (53%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Thorburn – Slater – Glass10:45

    xG 0.34–0.82 (29%)attempts 5–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien14:55

    xG 1.89–0.47 (80%)attempts 19–6goals 1–0

  2. Stuart – Jones9:57

    xG 1.22–0.26 (82%)attempts 13–8goals 4–0

  3. Hainsey – Bogosian15:27

    xG 0.71–1.12 (39%)attempts 10–20goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 5.8 xGFLA 3.2 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1183 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 85% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).