Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 8, 2012·American Airlines Center, Dallas

San Jose Sharks 3, Dallas Stars 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 64% of the time.

DAL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS016114213050348
DAL0819215031435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 12:16DALMichael RyderAssists: Jake Dowell, Trevor Daley · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 19:58SJSTorrey MitchellAssists: Joe Thornton, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:25SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:42DALJamie BennAssists: Ryan Garbutt, Adam Burish · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 16:28SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Dan Boyle, Joe Thornton · Backhand, 0.27 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:45DALTomas VincourAssists: Stephane Robidas, Jamie Benn · Snap, 0.06 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. DAL Jamie Benn stopped
  2. 2. SJS Ryane Clowe stopped
  3. 3. DAL Loui Eriksson stopped
  4. 4. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  5. 5. DAL Mike Ribeiro stopped
  6. 6. SJS Tommy Wingels stopped
  7. 7. DAL Michael Ryder stopped
  8. 8. SJS Dominic Moore stopped
  9. 9. DAL Tomas Vincour scored
  10. 10. SJS Logan Couture stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:29SJSDouglas Murray: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P1 11:48DALRyan Garbutt: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 17:16DALVernon Fiddler: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 7:30SJSTorrey Mitchell: Hooking2 min
  5. OT 2:37DALMichael Ryder: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Fiddler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSDAL
48Shots on goal35
3.1Expected goals2.2
88Shot attempts65
36Faceoffs won28
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
25Hits32
13Blocked shots22
1Giveaways10
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Marleau – Pavelski10:24

    xG 0.89–0.18 (83%)attempts 20–9goals 2–1

  2. Clowe – Couture – Wingels8:44

    xG 0.30–0.15 (67%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  3. Marleau – Clowe – Couture3:47

    xG 0.11–0.03 (79%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Moore – Mitchell – Winnik12:51

    xG 0.20–0.38 (35%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Vlasic15:57

    xG 1.05–0.39 (73%)attempts 26–17goals 3–2

  2. Murray – Burns12:58

    xG 0.41–0.28 (60%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Burns2:36

    xG 0.20–0.09 (70%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestDowell – Wandell – Vincour4:44

    xG 0.23–0.04 (86%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Burish – Benn – Garbutt10:22

    xG 0.35–0.26 (58%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  3. Dvorak – Fiddler – Nystrom12:00

    xG 0.24–0.28 (46%)attempts 11–16goals 0–1

  4. Ribeiro – Ryder – Eriksson14:59

    xG 0.39–0.84 (32%)attempts 17–22goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRobidas – Daley6:24

    xG 0.16–0.06 (71%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Daley – Goligoski2:18

    xG 0.14–0.12 (53%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Daley – Fistric8:35

    xG 0.27–0.29 (49%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.2 xGSJS 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #48 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.87 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 64% of the time.

DAL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).