Sat, Mar 10, 2012·Air Canada Centre, Toronto
Philadelphia Flyers 1, Toronto Maple Leafs 0 (SO)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | SO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 08 | 09 | 06 | 04 | 1 | 127 |
| TOR | 06 | 09 | 010 | 04 | 0 | 029 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- No goals in regulation or overtime.
Shootout
- 1. TOR Tyler Bozak stopped
- 2. PHI Wayne Simmonds stopped
- 3. TOR Mikhail Grabovski stopped
- 4. PHI Claude Giroux scored
- 5. TOR Phil Kessel stopped
Penalties (7)
- P1 4:48PHIAndreas Lilja: Tripping2 min
- P2 6:09TORDion Phaneuf: Slashing2 min
- P2 6:09PHIWayne Simmonds: Roughing2 min
- P2 6:09PHIWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
- P2 6:09TORJoey Crabb: Fighting5 min
- P2 13:03PHIScott Hartnell: Interference2 min
- P2 17:07PHIMatt Read: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Grabovski won the faceoff against Schenn
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestShelley – Wellwood – Schenn2:41
xG 0.20–0.05 (80%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Brière – Simmonds – Read9:29
xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0
- Hartnell – Giroux – Schenn4:10
xG 0.08–0.02 (78%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
- Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux10:53
xG 0.35–0.46 (43%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Lilja – Manning11:57
xG 0.25–0.39 (40%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0
- Coburn – Grossmann16:58
xG 0.30–0.49 (38%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0
- Carle – Gustafsson18:48
xG 0.67–0.98 (41%)attempts 16–23goals 0–0
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forward lines
- bestMacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin15:50
xG 0.65–0.26 (72%)attempts 24–10goals 0–0
- Steckel – Crabb – Ashton11:01
xG 0.43–0.09 (82%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0
- Connolly – Kessel – Bozak12:06
xG 0.40–0.25 (62%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0
- Lombardi – Rosehill – Frattin4:45
xG 0.16–0.41 (28%)attempts 2–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSchenn – Gardiner11:36
xG 0.68–0.32 (68%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0
- Gunnarsson – Gardiner4:22
xG 0.26–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Phaneuf – Gunnarsson14:34
xG 0.49–0.35 (58%)attempts 21–11goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (TOR − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).