Sat, Mar 10, 2012·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale
San Jose Sharks 0, Phoenix Coyotes 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 72% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJS | 016 | 09 | 017 | 042 |
| PHX | 09 | 214 | 16 | 329 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 13:58PHXMikkel BoedkerGWGAssists: Michael Stone, Marc-Antoine Pouliot · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–1
- P2 18:10PHXMichael StoneAssists: Marc-Antoine Pouliot, Gilbert Brule · Slap, 0.20 xG0–2
- P3 0:39PHXRaffi TorresAssists: Shane Doan, Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–3
Penalties (4)
- P1 16:08PHXMike Smith: Delaying game illegal play by goalie2 min
- P2 7:20PHXKeith Yandle: Slashing2 min
- P3 3:20SJSLogan Couture: Tripping2 min
- P3 7:47PHXAdrian Aucoin: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Langkow won the faceoff against Couture
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestThornton – Marleau – Pavelski12:30
xG 0.57–0.10 (86%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0
- Clowe – Couture – Wingels11:29
xG 0.41–0.29 (58%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1
- Handzus – Desjardins – Galiardi7:55
xG 0.05–0.35 (13%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
- Moore – Mitchell – Winnik7:31
xG 0.37–1.34 (22%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestBoyle – Vlasic11:42
xG 0.53–0.01 (97%)attempts 16–1goals 0–0
- Boyle – Demers2:56
xG 0.36–0.01 (96%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0
- Murray – Vlasic2:14
xG 0.17–0.01 (94%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0
Phoenix Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestPouliot – Brule – Boedker7:25
xG 1.53–0.21 (88%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0
- Langkow – Doan – Torres10:07
xG 0.75–0.31 (71%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0
- Whitney – Vrbata – Vermette7:36
xG 0.07–0.07 (52%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
- Pyatt – Vermette – Korpikoski5:25
xG 0.13–0.15 (46%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestYandle – Stone2:09
xG 1.69–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–1goals 2–0
- Klesla – Stone13:58
xG 0.44–0.70 (39%)attempts 10–27goals 0–0
- Aucoin – Yandle13:56
xG 0.29–0.62 (32%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 72% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHX − SJS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).