Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 11, 2012·United Center, Chicago

Los Angeles Kings 3, Chicago Blackhawks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK1171407011329
CHI011110116000237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:17LAKSlava VoynovAssists: Justin Williams, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:37CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Patrick Sharp, Viktor Stalberg · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:25LAKJeff CarterAssists: Dwight King, Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P3 7:36CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Marian Hossa, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Justin Williams stopped
  2. 2. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  3. 3. LAK Jeff Carter stopped
  4. 4. CHI Patrick Sharp stopped
  5. 5. LAK Dustin Brown stopped
  6. 6. CHI Marian Hossa stopped
  7. 7. LAK Jarret Stoll stopped
  8. 8. CHI Viktor Stalberg stopped
  9. 9. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  10. 10. CHI Andrew Shaw stopped
  11. 11. LAK Mike Richards scored
  12. 12. CHI Marcus Kruger stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:29CHIAndrew Shaw: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 12:19CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 12:19LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:26LAKDustin Penner: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 10:14LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:28LAKRob Scuderi: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  7. P3 17:16CHIViktor Stalberg: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← LAK attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kane won the faceoff against Richards
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCHI
29Shots on goal37
2.8Expected goals3.3
60Shot attempts67
42Faceoffs won30
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
33Hits34
20Blocked shots14
3Giveaways5
11Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Brown – Kopitar15:22

    xG 1.22–0.91 (57%)attempts 19–13goals 1–0

  2. Carter – Richards – King12:08

    xG 0.87–0.61 (59%)attempts 14–16goals 1–1

  3. Fraser – Clifford – Nolan6:02

    xG 0.16–0.20 (44%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Penner – Lewis10:55

    xG 0.18–0.36 (34%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty16:45

    xG 1.15–0.93 (55%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Greene6:07

    xG 0.30–0.10 (75%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Martinez11:30

    xG 0.30–0.29 (51%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Stalberg – Kruger5:12

    xG 0.43–0.14 (75%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Hossa – Sharp – Kane10:46

    xG 0.61–0.44 (58%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  3. Mayers – Hayes – Bollig2:12

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Mayers – Stalberg – Bollig2:57

    xG 0.03–0.04 (45%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Hjalmarsson2:37

    xG 0.48–0.07 (88%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Hjalmarsson – Olsen8:22

    xG 0.33–0.31 (52%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Oduya – Leddy14:42

    xG 0.48–0.67 (42%)attempts 19–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGLAK 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHILAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #294 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).