Tue, Mar 13, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
Dallas Stars 1, Minnesota Wild 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 010 | 09 | 16 | 125 |
| MIN | 08 | 09 | 08 | 025 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 3:46DALJamie BennGWGAssists: Brenden Morrow · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–0
Penalties (8)
- P1 14:44DALVernon Fiddler: Cross checking2 min
- P2 6:05DALTom Wandell: Charging2 min
- P2 9:24MINNate Prosser: Boarding2 min
- P2 15:15DALVernon Fiddler: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P2 15:15MINStephane Veilleux: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P2 16:57DALBrenden Morrow: Tripping2 min
- P2 18:08MINNick Palmieri: High sticking2 min
- P2 19:26DALBrenden Morrow: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Ott won the faceoff against Cullen
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Dallas Stars
Forward lines
- bestRibeiro – Ryder – Eriksson11:16
xG 0.64–0.10 (86%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0
- Morrow – Ott – Benn10:18
xG 0.38–0.14 (74%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0
- Wandell – Vincour – Garbutt5:03
xG 0.12–0.07 (62%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Fiddler – Burish – Nystrom10:40
xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestDaley – Pardy12:10
xG 0.74–0.09 (89%)attempts 19–7goals 1–0
- Robidas – Fistric16:39
xG 0.46–0.31 (60%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0
- Goligoski – Larsen14:34
xG 0.10–0.19 (33%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- bestHeatley – Christensen – Brodziak2:11
xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Heatley – Brodziak – Powe10:12
xG 0.13–0.08 (63%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0
- Peters – Ortmeyer – Kassian5:30
xG 0.10–0.08 (53%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0
- Cullen – Veilleux – Setoguchi7:37
xG 0.07–0.26 (21%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestKampfer – Scandella2:18
xG 0.44–0.07 (86%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Gilbert – Prosser2:38
xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Gilbert – Stoner3:32
xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MIN − DAL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).