Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 18, 2012·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT11711001102240
PHI080221413327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:21PITCraig AdamsAssists: Kris Letang, Pascal Dupuis · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 19:07PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Kris Letang, Craig Adams · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P3 0:31PHIKimmo TimonenPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:47PHIScott HartnellAssists: Claude Giroux, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. OT 4:59PHIScott HartnellGWGAssists: Daniel Brière, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 14:54PHIMatt Carle: Interference2 min
  2. P1 17:32PHIKimmo Timonen: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 10:02PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 10:02PHIZac Rinaldo: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 10:02PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 10:02PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:53PITChris Kunitz: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 19:30PITZbynek Michalek: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 2:29PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 12:40PITEvgeni Malkin: Elbowing2 min
  11. P3 14:56PITJames Neal: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 14:56PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 14:56PHIScott Hartnell: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 14:56PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  15. OT 0:34PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  16. OT 0:34PHIBraydon Coburn: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
40Shots on goal27
4.3Expected goals2.3
74Shot attempts51
27Faceoffs won36
2Power plays4
18Penalty minutes14
36Hits33
12Blocked shots17
4Giveaways8
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Kennedy – Crosby6:37

    xG 0.41–0.06 (87%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Sullivan – Kennedy – Crosby3:30

    xG 0.35–0.05 (87%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal16:15

    xG 0.79–0.53 (60%)attempts 20–12goals 0–0

  4. Asham – Adams – Tangradi3:13

    xG 0.19–0.11 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang16:27

    xG 1.32–0.59 (69%)attempts 23–14goals 2–0

  2. Orpik – Michalek16:48

    xG 0.87–0.24 (78%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Engelland – Niskanen10:30

    xG 0.55–0.61 (48%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestShelley – Wellwood – Schenn3:17

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Jagr – Giroux – Schenn2:02

    xG 0.11–0.04 (75%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Voracek – Rinaldo – Couturier9:25

    xG 0.46–0.56 (45%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Brière – Simmonds – Read8:42

    xG 0.15–0.60 (20%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Manning – Gustafsson11:08

    xG 0.27–0.24 (53%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  2. Carle – Gustafsson2:17

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Timonen – Carle14:25

    xG 0.35–0.59 (37%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.3 xGPIT 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #250 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).