Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 24, 2012·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Montréal Canadiens 1, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL0419011124
PHI18210115433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:07PHIKimmo TimonenPPAssists: Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:44MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: Lars Eller, Aaron Palushaj · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:57PHIDaniel BrièrePPGWGAssists: Matt Carle, Matt Read · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:38PHIDaniel BrièrePPAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Ilya Bryzgalov · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P3 18:07PHIMatt ReadAssists: Sean Couturier, Matt Carle · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–4
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 3:18PHISean Couturier: Holding2 min
  2. P1 11:01MTLTomas Plekanec: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:54MTLRyan White: Holding2 min
  4. P2 6:05MTLAlexei Emelin: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 11:50PHIDaniel Brière: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 14:47PHIMatt Carle: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 16:48MTLErik Cole: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 1:20MTLJosh Gorges: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 1:20PHIPavel Kubina: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 8:34MTLP.K. Subban: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 11:06PHIWayne Simmonds: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 11:06PHIWayne Simmonds: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 11:06MTLRyan White: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 11:06PHIWayne Simmonds: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 11:06MTLMike Blunden: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 11:45PHIIlya Bryzgalov: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← MTL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLPHI
24Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals3.1
46Shot attempts68
28Faceoffs won36
5Power plays5
27Penalty minutes27
33Hits26
21Blocked shots9
7Giveaways8
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestCole – Desharnais – Pacioretty12:25

    xG 0.61–0.52 (54%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  2. Plekanec – Bourque – Eller9:41

    xG 0.24–0.24 (51%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Nokelainen – Staubitz – Palushaj6:15

    xG 0.11–0.28 (28%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Blunden – White – Leblanc8:13

    xG 0.01–0.29 (5%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampoli – Emelin3:28

    xG 0.20–0.11 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Campoli – St-Denis10:32

    xG 0.41–0.35 (54%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Markov – Emelin9:09

    xG 0.40–0.36 (53%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Simmonds – Schenn7:17

    xG 0.38–0.21 (64%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Voracek – Wellwood – Read3:06

    xG 0.15–0.02 (88%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux11:31

    xG 0.35–0.32 (53%)attempts 16–6goals 0–0

  4. Talbot – Rinaldo – Couturier7:21

    xG 0.39–0.37 (52%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Carle10:41

    xG 0.53–0.35 (60%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  2. Kubina – Gustafsson13:02

    xG 0.35–0.29 (54%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  3. Coburn – Grossmann12:40

    xG 0.60–0.80 (43%)attempts 17–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.1 xGMTL 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #809 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).