Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 25, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

New Jersey Devils 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD111013110234
PIT2141925528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:04PITChris KunitzAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:10NJDZach PariseUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:04PITJordan StaalAssists: Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:34PITPascal DupuisGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Craig Adams · Snap, 0.33 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:37NJDIlya KovalchukAssists: Travis Zajac, Alexei Ponikarovsky · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:55PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Zbynek Michalek, Pascal Dupuis · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:28PITEvgeni MalkinENAssists: Jordan Staal, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.65 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:36PITJames Neal: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 12:13NJDTravis Zajac: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 14:06NJDAndy Greene: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 14:06PITJordan Staal: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 5:30NJDRyan Carter: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 11:20PITMatt Cooke: Interference2 min
  7. P3 19:20NJDPetr Sykora: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 19:58NJDMartin Brodeur: Delaying game illegal play by goalie2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← NJD attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDPIT
34Shots on goal28
3.0Expected goals3.2
67Shot attempts45
29Faceoffs won36
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
16Hits36
11Blocked shots18
4Giveaways9
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestPonikarovsky – Kovalchuk – Zajac10:18

    xG 1.24–0.56 (69%)attempts 20–6goals 1–1

  2. Bernier – Carter – Josefson6:12

    xG 0.23–0.16 (58%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Elias – Zubrus – Parise11:46

    xG 0.63–0.59 (52%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1

  4. Ponikarovsky – Kovalchuk – Josefson2:51

    xG 0.10–0.15 (39%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalvador – Zidlicky17:04

    xG 1.46–0.75 (66%)attempts 20–15goals 2–2

  2. Fayne – Greene14:08

    xG 0.34–0.40 (46%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Taormina – Larsson16:14

    xG 0.52–0.72 (42%)attempts 23–11goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal9:25

    xG 0.70–0.25 (74%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Adams – Cooke – Staal6:49

    xG 0.54–0.17 (76%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

  3. Park – Dupuis – Crosby2:31

    xG 0.14–0.01 (91%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  4. Dupuis – Kennedy – Crosby4:46

    xG 0.31–0.23 (57%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang8:22

    xG 1.08–0.55 (66%)attempts 13–9goals 2–0

  2. Martin – Engelland3:51

    xG 0.41–0.09 (83%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Engelland – Letang2:02

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.2 xGNJD 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #549 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).