Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 26, 2012·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Colorado Avalanche 1, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL01111209132
SJS010315211536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:50SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Justin Braun, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:19SJSAndrew DesjardinsGWGAssists: Tommy Wingels, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 11:47COLShane O'BrienAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:44SJSTorrey MitchellAssists: Michal Handzus, Dominic Moore · Snap, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:35SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Thornton · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–4
  6. P3 16:23SJSRyane CloweENAssists: Martin Havlat · Wrist, 0.63 xG1–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:25COLShane O'Brien: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:49COLRyan O'Byrne: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 18:33SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Holding2 min
  4. P2 19:21COLShane O'Brien: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:52SJSJoe Pavelski: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 5:40COLCody McLeod: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← COL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLSJS
32Shots on goal36
2.3Expected goals5.3
71Shot attempts69
32Faceoffs won34
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
27Hits14
15Blocked shots27
10Giveaways14
5Takeaways18

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestDownie – O'Reilly – Landeskog12:32

    xG 0.65–0.54 (55%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0

  2. Kobasew – McClement – McLeod3:56

    xG 0.10–0.05 (67%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Kobasew – McLeod – Olver2:32

    xG 0.03–0.02 (57%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Stastny – McGinn9:57

    xG 0.93–1.42 (40%)attempts 20–12goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Johnson17:19

    xG 0.97–0.74 (57%)attempts 26–16goals 1–1

  2. Hunwick – Wilson14:37

    xG 0.84–0.71 (54%)attempts 25–9goals 0–0

  3. O'Byrne – Hejda12:24

    xG 0.28–1.40 (17%)attempts 7–15goals 0–2

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHavlat – Clowe – Couture9:11

    xG 1.40–0.19 (88%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  2. Winnik – Desjardins – Wingels10:48

    xG 1.14–0.43 (73%)attempts 17–14goals 1–0

  3. Handzus – Moore – Mitchell6:41

    xG 0.74–0.57 (56%)attempts 5–13goals 1–0

  4. Marleau – Havlat – Clowe2:10

    xG 0.03–0.05 (42%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Burns13:09

    xG 1.49–0.67 (69%)attempts 16–18goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Demers9:07

    xG 0.61–0.15 (80%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Braun9:03

    xG 1.07–0.68 (61%)attempts 12–14goals 3–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 5.3 xGCOL 2.3 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #869 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.90 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).