Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 30, 2012·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Dallas Stars 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 56% of the time.

VAN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL01311314230
VAN1722027534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:17VANChris HigginsAssists: Jannik Hansen · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:16DALSteve OttAssists: Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:01VANSami SaloPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Ryan Kesler · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:25VANAndrew AlbertsGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Maxim Lapierre · Slap, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:06VANAlexandre BurrowsAssists: Henrik Sedin, Maxim Lapierre · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P3 11:18VANMaxim LapierreAssists: Marc-Andre Gragnani, Zack Kassian · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–5
  7. P3 17:18DALJake DowellAssists: Tomas Vincour, Philip Larsen · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 12:23DALBrenden Morrow: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P2 4:20VANAlexander Edler: Holding2 min
  3. P2 6:04DALBrenden Morrow: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:07DALAdam Pardy: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← DAL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Benn
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALVAN
30Shots on goal34
2.3Expected goals1.9
53Shot attempts52
23Faceoffs won31
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
23Hits19
11Blocked shots15
3Giveaways8
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Benn – Vincour8:53

    xG 0.83–0.33 (71%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  2. Dowell – Smith – Garbutt2:35

    xG 0.22–0.10 (69%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. Morrow – Dowell – Vincour3:43

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  4. Ott – Benn – Smith5:30

    xG 0.25–0.18 (58%)attempts 6–3goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Larsen14:37

    xG 1.05–0.27 (80%)attempts 18–7goals 1–3

  2. Daley – Goligoski2:11

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Souray – Robidas17:00

    xG 0.24–0.25 (49%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPahlsson – Higgins – Hansen12:32

    xG 0.38–0.13 (75%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Sedin – Burrows – Lapierre11:36

    xG 0.23–0.27 (46%)attempts 8–9goals 2–0

  3. Malhotra – Weise – Kassian9:50

    xG 0.26–0.45 (37%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Booth – Raymond11:30

    xG 0.35–0.96 (26%)attempts 16–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Tanev17:34

    xG 0.45–0.23 (66%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Salo – Edler2:00

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Gragnani15:44

    xG 0.38–0.40 (49%)attempts 13–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 1.9 xGDAL 2.3 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #674 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 56% of the time.

VAN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).