Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 31, 2012·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Ottawa Senators 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
OTT31201005022429
PHI01531404061339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:04OTTJason SpezzaAssists: Daniel Alfredsson, Matt Carkner · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:39OTTDaniel AlfredssonAssists: Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:27OTTChris NeilAssists: Rob Klinkhammer · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 2:59PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Brayden Schenn, Daniel Brière · Deflected, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:38PHISean CouturierAssists: Max Talbot, Nicklas Grossmann · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:17PHIBraydon CoburnAssists: Daniel Brière, Eric Wellwood · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Matt Read scored
  2. 2. OTT Milan Michalek scored
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. OTT Jason Spezza scored
  5. 5. PHI Daniel Brière stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:48OTTJared Cowen: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:47PHIMatt Read: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 8:39OTTFilip Kuba: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P1 15:04PHIMax Talbot: Holding2 min
  5. P2 11:24OTTSergei Gonchar: Interference2 min
  6. P2 14:52PHIDaniel Brière: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 18:13OTTMatt Carkner: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:13PHIScott Hartnell: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 9:56PHIKimmo Timonen: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 12:50OTTMilan Michalek: Illegal check to head2 min
  11. OT 4:11OTTFilip Kuba: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← OTT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Spezza
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPHI
29Shots on goal39
2.8Expected goals4.6
63Shot attempts69
28Faceoffs won32
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
36Hits42
17Blocked shots18
10Giveaways12
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestDaugavins – Condra – Smith4:45

    xG 0.48–0.05 (91%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Alfredsson – Spezza – Michalek2:13

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Neil – Klinkhammer – O'Brien3:18

    xG 0.09–0.05 (67%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  4. Alfredsson – Foligno – Turris8:51

    xG 0.34–0.45 (43%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Cowen7:05

    xG 0.53–0.29 (65%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  2. Phillips – Carkner5:40

    xG 0.55–0.37 (60%)attempts 9–4goals 2–0

  3. Gonchar – Phillips7:10

    xG 0.29–0.25 (54%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Simmonds – Schenn7:06

    xG 0.44–0.26 (63%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  2. Voracek – Wellwood – Read4:32

    xG 0.36–0.40 (47%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  3. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux9:17

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  4. Talbot – Rinaldo – Couturier10:56

    xG 0.03–0.15 (19%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Timonen – Carle10:49

    xG 0.36–0.34 (52%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Grossmann17:45

    xG 0.42–0.65 (39%)attempts 13–17goals 2–1

  3. Kubina – Bourdon9:41

    xG 0.40–0.71 (36%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.6 xGOTT 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #95 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.04 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).