Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 31, 2012·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Nashville Predators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11636115537
NSH01229212433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:25CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Andrew Shaw, Nick Leddy · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:05CHIDave BollandPPAssists: Marian Hossa, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:50CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:35CHIViktor StalbergAssists: Marcus Kruger · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–0
  5. P2 9:29NSHMartin EratPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–1
  6. P2 10:18NSHShea WeberAssists: Ryan Suter, Andrei Kostitsyn · Snap, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P3 4:38NSHAlexander RadulovAssists: David Legwand, Kevin Klein · Backhand, 0.12 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:10NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Ryan Suter, David Legwand · Slap, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:19CHIBrent SeabrookGWGAssists: Andrew Shaw, Bryan Bickell · Snap, 0.14 xG5–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:38NSHMatt Halischuk: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:27NSHPaul Gaustad: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 19:48NSHDavid Legwand: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:36CHISean O'Donnell: Holding2 min
  5. P2 9:21CHIDave Bolland: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:13NSHMartin Erat: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 16:46NSHGabriel Bourque: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 19:27CHIAndrew Brunette: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P3 6:05CHIDave Bolland: Boarding2 min · PPG
  10. P3 19:52NSHAlexander Radulov: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bolland won the faceoff against Spaling
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
37Shots on goal33
2.9Expected goals2.3
50Shot attempts51
20Faceoffs won42
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
6Hits15
14Blocked shots8
10Giveaways15
11Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBolland – Bickell – Shaw11:31

    xG 0.53–0.40 (57%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Brunette – Hossa – Kane9:10

    xG 0.20–0.12 (61%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Sharp – Stalberg – Kruger12:09

    xG 0.63–0.83 (43%)attempts 9–17goals 1–1

  4. Mayers – Hayes – Bollig2:37

    xG 0.02–0.41 (4%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Donnell – Seabrook2:36

    xG 0.29–0.18 (62%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  2. Oduya – Hjalmarsson3:14

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Seabrook – Hjalmarsson16:25

    xG 0.46–0.42 (52%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Spaling – Bourque9:00

    xG 0.68–0.23 (75%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  2. Legwand – Kostitsyn – Radulov13:10

    xG 0.65–0.44 (60%)attempts 13–11goals 2–1

  3. Gaustad – Tootoo – Halischuk3:28

    xG 0.36–0.35 (51%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  4. Fisher – Erat – Kostitsyn10:07

    xG 0.08–0.21 (28%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGill – Josi10:40

    xG 0.40–0.20 (66%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Bouillon – Klein10:11

    xG 0.74–0.74 (50%)attempts 13–12goals 1–2

  3. Suter – Weber18:12

    xG 0.46–0.57 (44%)attempts 17–14goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.3 xGCHI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #52 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 8 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).