Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 31, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Los Angeles Kings 3, Minnesota Wild 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK291807050329
MIN290517022423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:40MINDarroll PoweAssists: Nate Prosser, Justin Falk · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:28LAKBrad RichardsonAssists: Dustin Brown, Anze Kopitar · Backhand, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P1 3:45MINNick JohnsonAssists: Jason Zucker, Erik Christensen · Wrist, 0.39 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:31LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Mike Richards, Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.54 xG2–2
  5. P2 0:57LAKBrad RichardsonAssists: Anze Kopitar, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:57MINErik ChristensenAssists: Jason Zucker, Justin Falk · Deflected, 0.10 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Erik Christensen scored
  2. 2. LAK Justin Williams stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  4. 4. LAK Mike Richards stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:22LAKColin Fraser: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 12:00LAKMike Richards: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 14:14MINStephane Veilleux: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 17:43MINWarren Peters: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 11:41MINJustin Falk: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 12:31LAKDwight King: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P3 19:37MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← LAK attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Richards
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKMIN
29Shots on goal23
2.6Expected goals2.2
69Shot attempts43
32Faceoffs won34
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
17Hits16
8Blocked shots20
3Giveaways4
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Richards – King10:22

    xG 0.38–0.06 (87%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Richardson – Kopitar10:55

    xG 0.69–0.41 (63%)attempts 19–8goals 2–2

  3. Fraser – Clifford – Nolan6:10

    xG 0.12–0.05 (72%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Penner – Lewis10:34

    xG 0.05–0.68 (7%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMitchell – Voynov15:45

    xG 0.79–0.38 (67%)attempts 17–14goals 2–2

  2. Scuderi – Doughty17:40

    xG 0.32–0.30 (52%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Greene2:38

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestChristensen – Johnson – Zucker11:59

    xG 0.70–0.12 (85%)attempts 9–8goals 2–0

  2. Heatley – Koivu – Setoguchi12:31

    xG 0.27–0.25 (52%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  3. Peters – Veilleux – Ortmeyer5:04

    xG 0.07–0.09 (41%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Clutterbuck – Powe7:56

    xG 0.12–0.46 (20%)attempts 4–16goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFoster – Kampfer4:15

    xG 0.55–0.09 (85%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Foster – Falk4:32

    xG 0.05–0.04 (56%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Foster – Gilbert2:06

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.2 xGLAK 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #145 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).