Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 1, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1816412626
PIT215015217447

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:14PITSteve SullivanAssists: Sidney Crosby, Pascal Dupuis · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:58PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:09PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Scott Hartnell · Snap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:25PHIMax TalbotAssists: Zac Rinaldo, Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:35PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:37PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Eric Wellwood, Braydon Coburn · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:15PHIMarc-Andre BourdonGWGAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.02 xG5–2
  8. P3 15:18PITSteve SullivanAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:45PHIJakub VoracekENAssists: Matt Carle, Max Talbot · Wrist, 0.60 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:28PITChris KunitzAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.33 xG6–4
Penalties (23)
  1. P1 6:58PHIDaniel Brière: Interference2 min
  2. P1 16:36PITMatt Niskanen: Holding2 min
  3. P2 14:20PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 14:30PITSteve Sullivan: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 16:17PHIDaniel Brière: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 19:42PHIEric Wellwood: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 1:12PITChris Kunitz: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P3 9:09PITMatt Cooke: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 18:57PHIJakub Voracek: Delaying game bench2 min
  10. P3 18:57PHIBrayden Schenn: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 18:57PITJoe Vitale: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. P3 18:57PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 18:57PITCraig Adams: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P3 18:57PHIDaniel Brière: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  15. P3 18:57PHIBrayden Schenn: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 18:57PITArron Asham: Misconduct10 min
  17. P3 18:57PHIWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
  18. P3 18:57PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  19. P3 18:57PHIPavel Kubina: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  20. P3 18:57PITArron Asham: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  21. P3 18:57PHIZac Rinaldo: Misconduct10 min
  22. P3 18:57PITMatt Niskanen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  23. P3 18:57PITPaul Martin: Delaying game bench2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
26Shots on goal47
3.0Expected goals4.9
45Shot attempts82
33Faceoffs won36
3Power plays5
35Penalty minutes33
27Hits41
17Blocked shots11
3Giveaways12
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Wellwood – Read7:34

    xG 0.58–0.36 (61%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Talbot – Rinaldo – Couturier11:10

    xG 0.16–0.28 (37%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

  3. Brière – Simmonds – Schenn8:21

    xG 0.27–0.56 (33%)attempts 3–14goals 0–1

  4. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux9:53

    xG 0.11–0.64 (14%)attempts 6–11goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKubina – Bourdon5:59

    xG 0.52–0.26 (67%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  2. Timonen – Kubina2:02

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Kubina – Coburn2:06

    xG 0.07–0.12 (38%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal10:55

    xG 1.24–0.31 (80%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  2. Sullivan – Dupuis – Crosby9:05

    xG 0.71–0.27 (73%)attempts 15–7goals 2–1

  3. Asham – Adams – Vitale2:36

    xG 0.13–0.15 (47%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Cooke – Kennedy – Staal7:56

    xG 0.15–0.50 (24%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang17:29

    xG 2.23–0.43 (84%)attempts 31–10goals 2–1

  2. Orpik – Michalek14:29

    xG 0.52–0.27 (66%)attempts 15–11goals 1–2

  3. Engelland – Niskanen9:08

    xG 0.26–0.32 (45%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.9 xGPHI 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #143 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.44 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).