Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 3, 2012·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Winnipeg Jets 5, Florida Panthers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
WPG0521321012530
FLA21211011204438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:03FLAMarco SturmAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Marcel Goc · Tip-in, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:00FLAKris VersteegPPAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Brian Campbell · Slap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:25FLATomas FleischmannAssists: Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–3
  4. P2 13:15WPGEvander KaneAssists: Spencer Machacek, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:21WPGZach BogosianUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:53WPGAndrew LaddAssists: Dustin Byfuglien, Bryan Little · Snap, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:45WPGBryan LittlePPAssists: Blake Wheeler, Dustin Byfuglien · Slap, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:07FLATomas KopeckyAssists: Marco Sturm, Scottie Upshall · Snap, 0.02 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:12WPGAndrew LaddGWGAssists: Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 9:39WPGGrant Clitsome: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 13:15WPGChris Thorburn: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 13:40FLAJason Garrison: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 2:00FLAMike Weaver: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
45% to win55% to win
← WPG attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthias won the faceoff against Antropov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGFLA
30Shots on goal38
2.8Expected goals3.0
50Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won28
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
26Hits22
15Blocked shots8
4Giveaways8
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestThorburn – Slater – Cormier7:33

    xG 0.78–0.09 (90%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little14:50

    xG 1.06–0.83 (56%)attempts 19–16goals 1–2

  3. Antropov – Miettinen – Stapleton9:58

    xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Machacek – Kane – Burmistrov11:00

    xG 0.25–0.73 (25%)attempts 4–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Bogosian12:54

    xG 1.01–0.40 (72%)attempts 12–9goals 2–1

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien15:49

    xG 0.92–0.54 (63%)attempts 17–14goals 1–1

  3. Stuart – Clitsome8:04

    xG 0.20–0.07 (73%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestWeiss – Fleischmann – Versteeg15:34

    xG 0.61–0.41 (60%)attempts 13–14goals 1–2

  2. Samuelsson – Goc – Bergenheim11:36

    xG 0.29–0.49 (37%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  3. Sturm – Madden – Kopecky5:54

    xG 0.08–0.44 (15%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Upshall – Wolski – Matthias8:11

    xG 0.42–0.83 (34%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Garrison17:58

    xG 1.46–0.39 (79%)attempts 25–14goals 2–1

  2. Campbell – Kulikov2:04

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Weaver – Kulikov18:12

    xG 0.57–1.05 (35%)attempts 14–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.0 xGWPG 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #15 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.47 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).