Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 5, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Chicago Blackhawks 1, Minnesota Wild 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI11001101010123
MIN0301118011223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:37CHIJamal MayersAssists: Michael Frolik · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P3 16:48MINCal ClutterbuckPPAssists: Marco Scandella, Dany Heatley · Deflected, 0.04 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Erik Christensen stopped
  2. 2. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  4. 4. CHI Patrick Sharp stopped
  5. 5. MIN Devin Setoguchi scored
  6. 6. CHI Viktor Stalberg stopped
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 8:19MINDany Heatley: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:19MINNate Prosser: Head butting5 min
  3. P1 18:19MINNate Prosser: Game misconduct10 min
  4. P2 4:59MINTyler Cuma: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 9:24CHIPatrick Kane: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 15:23MINJustin Falk: Holding2 min
  7. P2 15:23MINJason Zucker: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 15:23CHIJamal Mayers: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 15:40CHIBryan Bickell: High sticking2 min · PPG
  10. OT 4:21CHIPatrick Kane: Roughing2 min
  11. OT 4:21MINCal Clutterbuck: Roughing2 min
  12. OT 4:21CHIPatrick Kane: Roughing2 min
  13. OT 4:21MINCal Clutterbuck: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kruger won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIMIN
23Shots on goal23
2.4Expected goals1.7
63Shot attempts40
31Faceoffs won24
4Power plays2
10Penalty minutes27
13Hits18
11Blocked shots18
2Giveaways6
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestMorrison – Bickell – Hayes2:27

    xG 0.37–0.02 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Mayers – Frolik – Bollig7:06

    xG 0.31–0.08 (80%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Hossa – Kane – Hayes9:06

    xG 0.28–0.10 (75%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  4. Morrison – Bickell – Shaw9:54

    xG 0.16–0.20 (44%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Leddy13:35

    xG 0.80–0.47 (63%)attempts 18–9goals 1–0

  2. O'Donnell – Hjalmarsson13:56

    xG 0.32–0.06 (85%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook12:41

    xG 0.17–0.40 (29%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrodziak – Clutterbuck – Powe9:08

    xG 0.43–0.31 (58%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  2. Heatley – Koivu – Setoguchi13:42

    xG 0.20–0.18 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Christensen – Johnson – Zucker7:02

    xG 0.10–0.27 (27%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Peters – Veilleux – Ortmeyer5:36

    xG 0.01–0.28 (4%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFoster – Falk7:20

    xG 0.37–0.09 (80%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Foster – Cuma4:46

    xG 0.24–0.17 (58%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Gilbert – Scandella14:34

    xG 0.25–0.18 (57%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.7 xGCHI 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #578 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).