Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 31, 2013·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Nashville Predators 2, Los Angeles Kings 1 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NSH130503034214
LAK1100507023124

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:58NSHBrandon YipAssists: Gabriel Bourque, David Legwand · Snap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:08LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Drew Doughty, Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.49 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Jeff Carter stopped
  2. 2. NSH David Legwand scored
  3. 3. LAK Mike Richards scored
  4. 4. NSH Craig Smith scored
  5. 5. LAK Dustin Brown scored
  6. 6. NSH Martin Erat stopped
  7. 7. LAK Drew Doughty stopped
  8. 8. NSH Colin Wilson stopped
  9. 9. LAK Jarret Stoll stopped
  10. 10. NSH Brandon Yip stopped
  11. 11. LAK Anze Kopitar scored
  12. 12. NSH Gabriel Bourque scored
  13. 13. LAK Justin Williams stopped
  14. 14. NSH Roman Josi stopped
  15. 15. LAK Simon Gagne stopped
  16. 16. NSH Sergei Kostitsyn scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:24NSHScott Hannan: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:10NSHScott Hannan: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:10NSHPaul Gaustad: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 12:12LAKAnze Kopitar: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 18:32NSHHal Gill: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 0:00LAKDustin Brown: Interference2 min
  7. P2 3:07NSHScott Hannan: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 8:17LAKMike Richards: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P3 14:04NSHPaul Gaustad: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
43% to win57% to win
← NSH attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHLAK
14Shots on goal24
1.0Expected goals2.7
31Shot attempts67
34Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
31Hits38
24Blocked shots8
13Giveaways15
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. Gaustad – Clune – Halischuk4:10

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Erat – Wilson10:47

    xG 0.21–0.26 (44%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Kostitsyn – Spaling – Smith8:42

    xG 0.08–0.22 (27%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Legwand – Yip – Bourque7:48

    xG 0.07–0.32 (19%)attempts 3–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Klein – Josi8:23

    xG 0.24–0.20 (54%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Weber – Josi2:02

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Ellis2:06

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestGagne – Carter – Richards2:00

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Richards – Clifford8:02

    xG 0.43–0.07 (87%)attempts 13–3goals 0–1

  3. Williams – Brown – Kopitar11:22

    xG 0.27–0.20 (57%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  4. Gagne – Stoll – Lewis7:34

    xG 0.05–0.07 (45%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty16:09

    xG 0.57–0.11 (84%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Martinez – Voynov16:07

    xG 0.57–0.19 (75%)attempts 18–11goals 0–1

  3. Muzzin – Drewiske10:12

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.7 xGNSH 1.0 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #345 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).