Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 5, 2013·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Nashville Predators 6, St. Louis Blues 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH392317619
STL04114014132

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:10NSHRyan EllisPPAssists: Martin Erat, Colin Wilson · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:53NSHRich CluneGWGAssists: Colin Wilson, Paul Gaustad · Tip-in, 0.38 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:13NSHNick SpalingAssists: Brandon Yip, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–0
  4. P2 9:09NSHKevin KleinAssists: Jonathon Blum, Martin Erat · Slap, 0.02 xG4–0
  5. P2 10:09NSHGabriel BourqueAssists: Colin Wilson, Paul Gaustad · Tip-in, 0.07 xG5–0
  6. P2 13:09STLAlex PietrangeloPPAssists: T.J. Oshie, David Perron · Backhand, 0.05 xG5–1
  7. P3 16:34NSHMartin EratAssists: Ryan Ellis, Jonathon Blum · Wrist, 0.25 xG6–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:55STLAndy McDonald: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:41STLAlexander Steen: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 12:41NSHDavid Legwand: Diving2 min
  4. P2 11:53NSHRoman Josi: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:07NSHSergei Kostitsyn: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 19:38NSHShea Weber: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 1:15NSHRoman Josi: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 5:22STLVladimir Sobotka: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 17:07NSHNick Spaling: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 0:00NSHPaul Gaustad: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 0:00STLChris Stewart: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← NSH attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHSTL
19Shots on goal32
2.3Expected goals2.1
36Shot attempts58
34Faceoffs won36
2Power plays5
14Penalty minutes8
6Hits17
18Blocked shots6
2Giveaways3
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Clune – Wilson2:52

    xG 0.52–0.10 (84%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  2. Fisher – Erat – Kostitsyn8:45

    xG 0.12–0.03 (81%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Yip – Spaling – Smith4:49

    xG 0.21–0.13 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  4. Gaustad – Yip – Clune2:09

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Weber14:55

    xG 0.70–0.13 (84%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  2. Blum – Ellis5:06

    xG 0.42–0.09 (82%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Gill – Ellis4:19

    xG 0.11–0.02 (87%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestMcDonald – Steen – Tarasenko9:39

    xG 0.58–0.19 (75%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  2. Sobotka – Stewart – Berglund7:17

    xG 0.12–0.15 (44%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Backes – Oshie – Perron10:05

    xG 0.14–0.25 (35%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Langenbrunner – Nichol – D'Agostini5:35

    xG 0.00–0.14 (3%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Russell13:08

    xG 0.62–0.51 (55%)attempts 16–6goals 0–2

  2. Shattenkirk – Pietrangelo3:23

    xG 0.12–0.05 (69%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Redden – Pietrangelo14:32

    xG 0.27–0.49 (36%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.1 xGNSH 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #607 of 720 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).