Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 7, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Montréal Canadiens 4, Buffalo Sabres 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 88% of the time.

BUF winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL11321215021432
BUF110118210022540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:11MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: Rene Bourque, Alexei Emelin · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:26BUFSteve OttAssists: Jochen Hecht · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:31MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Brandon Prust, Raphael Diaz · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:06BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:32MTLP.K. SubbanPPAssists: Andrei Markov, Max Pacioretty · Slap, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:45MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: Brian Gionta, Rene Bourque · Snap, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:57BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Tyler Ennis, Marcus Foligno · Backhand, 0.34 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:58BUFThomas VanekAssists: Steve Ott, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.42 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Thomas Vanek scored
  2. 2. MTL Alex Galchenyuk scored
  3. 3. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  4. 4. MTL Rene Bourque stopped
  5. 5. BUF Jason Pominville scored
  6. 6. MTL Brian Gionta stopped
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 7:15BUFThomas Vanek: Interference2 min
  2. P1 14:48BUFTJ Brennan: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:48MTLBrendan Gallagher: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 14:48MTLBrendan Gallagher: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 2:50MTLColby Armstrong: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 4:04MTLRene Bourque: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 8:16MTLErik Cole: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P2 14:57MTLBrian Gionta: Holding2 min
  9. P2 17:06BUFCody Hodgson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P2 17:39BUFSteve Ott: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 7:32MTLRyan White: Roughing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 7:32MTLRyan White: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 13:37BUFJochen Hecht: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← MTL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLBUF
32Shots on goal40
2.4Expected goals5.2
53Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won34
4Power plays7
16Penalty minutes10
20Hits15
12Blocked shots11
6Giveaways8
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGionta – Plekanec – Bourque11:51

    xG 0.71–0.26 (73%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

  2. Cole – Desharnais – Pacioretty9:13

    xG 0.36–0.26 (59%)attempts 11–9goals 0–2

  3. Prust – Gallagher – Galchenyuk4:18

    xG 0.06–0.08 (42%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  4. Armstrong – White – Eller3:51

    xG 0.01–0.06 (13%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Diaz8:55

    xG 0.29–0.11 (73%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Bouillon – Subban13:53

    xG 0.43–0.29 (60%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

  3. Gorges – Emelin2:13

    xG 0.08–0.02 (80%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Ott – Grigorenko7:02

    xG 0.25–0.15 (61%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson10:05

    xG 0.47–0.47 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–2

  3. McCormick – Gerbe – Scott2:56

    xG 0.01–0.04 (14%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno10:10

    xG 0.27–0.38 (42%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSulzer – Brennan5:30

    xG 0.21–0.11 (65%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Leopold – Ehrhoff10:01

    xG 0.32–0.27 (54%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. Leopold – Weber2:01

    xG 0.04–0.03 (60%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 5.2 xGMTL 2.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #14 of 720 this seasonSwing 3.38 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 88% of the time.

BUF winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).