Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 9, 2013·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Anaheim Ducks 6, St. Louis Blues 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 68% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA1631015024623
STL31106212023531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:21STLAlexander SteenPPAssists: Chris Stewart, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:09ANABobby RyanAssists: Teemu Selanne, Francois Beauchemin · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:30STLDavid BackesAssists: Andy McDonald, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:26STLDavid PerronAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Chris Stewart · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:40ANATeemu SelanneAssists: Saku Koivu, Bobby Ryan · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:25ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Nick Bonino, Daniel Winnik · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P2 14:21ANABobby RyanAssists: Teemu Selanne, Francois Beauchemin · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 3:21STLT.J. OshieAssists: David Backes, Alexander Steen · Backhand, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. P3 13:41ANASaku KoivuAssists: Bobby Ryan, Teemu Selanne · Wrist, 0.05 xG5–4
  10. P3 15:26STLChris StewartPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Andy McDonald · Wrist, 0.38 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. STL T.J. Oshie stopped
  2. 2. ANA Teemu Selanne stopped
  3. 3. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  4. 4. ANA Saku Koivu scored
  5. 5. STL David Perron scored
  6. 6. ANA Bobby Ryan stopped
  7. 7. STL Chris Stewart scored
  8. 8. ANA Corey Perry scored
  9. 9. STL Alexander Steen scored
  10. 10. ANA Ryan Getzlaf scored
  11. 11. STL Patrik Berglund stopped
  12. 12. ANA Nick Bonino scored
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 5:01ANAEmerson Etem: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P3 0:47STLDavid Backes: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P3 14:34ANARyan Getzlaf: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASTL
23Shots on goal31
1.8Expected goals2.8
44Shot attempts62
32Faceoffs won36
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
21Hits18
17Blocked shots15
4Giveaways6
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Winnik – Cogliano7:16

    xG 0.44–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Selanne – Koivu – Ryan2:45

    xG 0.27–0.08 (76%)attempts 4–1goals 2–0

  3. Selanne – Ryan – Etem6:01

    xG 0.17–0.09 (66%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Palmieri5:17

    xG 0.20–0.13 (60%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSouray – Beauchemin14:00

    xG 0.96–0.39 (71%)attempts 17–8goals 3–1

  2. Allen – Lovejoy10:42

    xG 0.16–0.27 (37%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

  3. Lydman – Sbisa15:16

    xG 0.23–0.47 (33%)attempts 6–14goals 1–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestMcDonald – Backes – Oshie11:32

    xG 0.45–0.31 (60%)attempts 15–8goals 2–0

  2. Nichol – Reaves – Schwartz5:49

    xG 0.06–0.02 (75%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Steen – Sobotka – Tarasenko8:27

    xG 0.25–0.29 (46%)attempts 9–6goals 0–2

  4. Stewart – Berglund – Perron10:28

    xG 0.38–0.55 (41%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRedden – Polak9:47

    xG 0.24–0.16 (60%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

  2. Cole – Pietrangelo15:30

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  3. Jackman – Shattenkirk12:47

    xG 0.44–0.69 (39%)attempts 11–16goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGANA 1.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #6 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.91 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 68% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).