Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 15, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Boston Bruins 2, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS11211703232
BUF11006310426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:24BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Tyler Ennis, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:56BOSDougie HamiltonPPAssists: David Krejci, Tyler Seguin · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:29BOSRich PeverleyAssists: Dougie Hamilton, Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:03BUFTyler MyersAssists: Jochen Hecht, Nathan Gerbe · Backhand, 0.24 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:02BUFChristian EhrhoffGWGAssists: Drew Stafford, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:45BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Tyler Myers, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:42BOSAdam McQuaid: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:17BUFDrew Stafford: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 14:19BOSMilan Lucic: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 14:42BUFSteve Ott: Interference2 min
  5. P3 2:35BOSAdam McQuaid: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← BOS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Krejci won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSBUF
32Shots on goal26
3.0Expected goals2.9
61Shot attempts49
31Faceoffs won22
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
14Hits23
14Blocked shots13
10Giveaways14
6Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Seguin11:17

    xG 0.72–0.22 (77%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Kelly – Bourque – Peverley10:34

    xG 0.50–0.31 (61%)attempts 8–6goals 0–2

  3. Thornton – Campbell – Paille7:34

    xG 0.17–0.19 (46%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Horton – Krejci – Lucic12:58

    xG 0.33–1.20 (22%)attempts 11–19goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Boychuk13:20

    xG 1.38–0.49 (74%)attempts 23–9goals 0–1

  2. Seidenberg – McQuaid2:41

    xG 0.09–0.01 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Chara – McQuaid2:37

    xG 0.05–0.10 (35%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Ott – Gerbe6:11

    xG 0.35–0.01 (97%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno13:43

    xG 0.39–0.24 (62%)attempts 16–8goals 2–0

  3. Hecht – Kaleta – Scott2:54

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson11:19

    xG 0.52–0.44 (54%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Myers2:17

    xG 0.47–0.09 (83%)attempts 3–5goals 2–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Sulzer17:27

    xG 0.37–0.60 (38%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

  3. Leopold – Sekera12:30

    xG 0.30–0.66 (31%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.9 xGBOS 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #322 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.70 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).