Sun, Feb 17, 2013·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
Detroit Red Wings 2, Minnesota Wild 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 71% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 114 | 110 | 07 | 231 |
| MIN | 08 | 311 | 05 | 324 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:48DETDamien BrunnerAssists: Pavel Datsyuk, Henrik Zetterberg · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–0
- P2 0:20DETPavel DatsyukAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Brian Lashoff · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–0
- P2 9:35MINDany HeatleyAssists: Mikko Koivu, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.19 xG2–1
- P2 13:13MINJason ZuckerUnassisted · Snap, 0.09 xG2–2
- P2 13:45MINTorrey MitchellGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund · Backhand, 0.03 xG2–3
Penalties (4)
- P1 2:33DETJoakim Andersson: Holding2 min
- P2 15:16MINDevin Setoguchi: High sticking double minor4 min
- P3 7:19DETBrian Lashoff: Holding2 min
- P3 13:47MINNate Prosser: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Zetterberg won the faceoff against Koivu
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestAbdelkader – Andersson – Tatar9:05
xG 0.58–0.07 (90%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1
- Datsyuk – Zetterberg – Brunner12:41
xG 0.43–0.44 (50%)attempts 14–8goals 2–1
- Cleary – Samuelsson – Filppula10:00
xG 0.14–0.27 (34%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1
- Tootoo – Miller – Emmerton8:44
xG 0.12–0.51 (19%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHuskins – Quincey12:55
xG 0.65–0.29 (69%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0
- White – Ericsson14:23
xG 0.47–0.38 (55%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1
- Kronwall – Lashoff14:31
xG 0.44–0.52 (46%)attempts 17–9goals 1–2
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- bestHeatley – Koivu – Parise14:33
xG 0.60–0.43 (58%)attempts 10–12goals 1–2
- Cullen – Setoguchi – Zucker9:31
xG 0.21–0.10 (69%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0
- Rupp – Mitchell – Granlund5:12
xG 0.08–0.06 (57%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0
- Brodziak – Clutterbuck – Larsson11:37
xG 0.35–0.67 (34%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestStoner – Spurgeon3:03
xG 0.45–0.06 (88%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0
- Suter – Brodin8:48
xG 0.21–0.10 (67%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1
- Gilbert – Prosser2:01
xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 71% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MIN − DET), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).