Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 17, 2013·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

St. Louis Blues 4, Vancouver Canucks 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 80% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL1811113012423
VAN2804114050331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:37VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:45STLT.J. OshieAssists: David Backes, David Perron · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:10VANHenrik SedinAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Alexander Edler · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:13STLAndy McDonaldAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Barret Jackman · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:00STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Vladimir Sobotka, Chris Stewart · Deflected, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:13VANMason RaymondPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Ryan Kesler stopped
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie scored
  3. 3. VAN Alexandre Burrows stopped
  4. 4. STL Andy McDonald scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:32STLChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:44VANChris Tanev: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 14:38VANDan Hamhuis: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 1:48STLRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 1:48VANAaron Volpatti: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 10:44STLRoman Polak: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 12:03STLAlex Pietrangelo: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 16:39STLIan Cole: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
43% to win57% to win
← STL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLVAN
23Shots on goal31
1.6Expected goals3.4
43Shot attempts67
39Faceoffs won35
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
21Hits19
23Blocked shots11
3Giveaways8
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBackes – Oshie – Perron12:53

    xG 0.35–0.15 (69%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  2. Sobotka – Stewart – Berglund5:30

    xG 0.27–0.15 (64%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  3. Nichol – Sobotka – Reaves2:08

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. McDonald – Steen – Tarasenko11:20

    xG 0.55–0.62 (47%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Polak15:50

    xG 0.83–0.43 (66%)attempts 12–13goals 3–1

  2. Cole – Pietrangelo16:26

    xG 0.45–0.62 (42%)attempts 9–19goals 0–0

  3. Redden – Shattenkirk11:55

    xG 0.10–0.32 (24%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows13:37

    xG 1.08–0.14 (89%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  2. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti4:07

    xG 0.01–0.06 (18%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Kesler – Hansen – Raymond4:42

    xG 0.06–0.14 (32%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  4. Hansen – Raymond – Schroeder7:21

    xG 0.22–0.32 (41%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBallard – Tanev13:40

    xG 1.20–0.64 (65%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Bieksa – Garrison17:29

    xG 0.30–0.25 (54%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Edler17:03

    xG 0.51–0.53 (49%)attempts 15–10goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.4 xGSTL 1.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #74 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.54 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 80% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).