Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 20, 2013·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI2151938632
PIT21309310532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:07PITMatt NiskanenAssists: Kris Letang · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:15PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Paul Martin, James Neal · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:49PHINicklas GrossmannAssists: Mike Knuble, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P1 12:49PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Daniel Brière, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:50PHIJakub VoracekPPAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Brayden Schenn · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:18PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Braydon Coburn, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 5:29PITTyler KennedyAssists: Paul Martin, Brooks Orpik · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:36PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Max Talbot, Bruno Gervais · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–3
  9. P3 12:46PITJames NealPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.17 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:57PITBrandon SutterAssists: Paul Martin, Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–5
  11. P3 18:29PHIJakub VoracekGWGAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.03 xG6–5
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 5:20PHIHarry Zolnierczyk: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:15PITDeryk Engelland: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 13:15PITMatt Cooke: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 13:15PHIJakub Voracek: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 13:28PITTanner Glass: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 13:28PHIBrayden Schenn: Cross checking2 min
  7. P1 13:28PHIWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 17:20PHIZac Rinaldo: Slashing2 min
  9. P1 17:20PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 4:45PHISean Couturier: Cross checking2 min
  11. P2 10:24PITJames Neal: Interference2 min
  12. P2 18:28PITCraig Adams: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  13. P3 1:14PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 1:14PHISean Couturier: Slashing2 min
  15. P3 1:14PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 7:56PITTanner Glass: High sticking double minor4 min
  17. P3 11:36PHIMike Knuble: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  18. P3 12:17PHIRuslan Fedotenko: High sticking2 min
  19. P3 13:52PHIMax Talbot: Closing hand on puck2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
32Shots on goal32
3.7Expected goals3.5
50Shot attempts60
20Faceoffs won41
6Power plays7
25Penalty minutes23
16Hits11
15Blocked shots9
2Giveaways4
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrière – Simmonds – Schenn5:34

    xG 0.33–0.13 (72%)attempts 2–7goals 1–0

  2. Knuble – Talbot – Couturier7:26

    xG 0.44–0.25 (64%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Fedotenko – Rinaldo – Zolnierczyk5:21

    xG 0.14–0.01 (91%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Brière – Giroux – Voracek2:01

    xG 0.02–0.13 (12%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Schenn8:29

    xG 0.59–0.28 (67%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  2. Gervais – Gustafsson7:57

    xG 0.24–0.17 (59%)attempts 5–9goals 1–1

  3. Coburn – Grossmann13:39

    xG 0.86–0.93 (48%)attempts 13–15goals 3–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKennedy – Sutter – Bennett4:30

    xG 0.20–0.08 (71%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  2. Cooke – Malkin – Neal6:34

    xG 0.26–0.14 (64%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Glass – Vitale3:04

    xG 0.01–0.28 (5%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby8:59

    xG 0.54–1.00 (35%)attempts 10–10goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. Engelland – Bortuzzo4:03

    xG 0.04–0.03 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Martin10:09

    xG 0.65–0.79 (45%)attempts 11–9goals 1–2

  3. Niskanen – Letang10:58

    xG 0.45–0.84 (35%)attempts 11–11goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.5 xGPHI 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #4 of 720 this seasonSwing 3.07 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).