Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 23, 2013·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Phoenix Coyotes 2, Edmonton Oilers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHX19111014020236
EDM012116111042343

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:23PHXKyle ChipchuraAssists: Nick Johnson, Paul Bissonnette · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:42PHXMatthew LombardiPPAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Lauri Korpikoski · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:22EDMJordan EberleAssists: Nail Yakupov, Sam Gagner · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P3 8:04EDMTeemu HartikainenPPAssists: Ryan Smyth, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. EDM Sam Gagner scored
  2. 2. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  3. 3. EDM Jordan Eberle scored
  4. 4. PHX David Rundblad stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:25EDMChris VandeVelde: Holding2 min
  2. P1 12:26PHXDavid Moss: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:56EDMBen Eager: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 16:53EDMJeff Petry: Interference2 min
  5. P2 6:15EDMNick Schultz: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:54PHXRostislav Klesla: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 13:55EDMBen Eager: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 4:21EDMEric Belanger: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 7:57PHXKeith Yandle: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. OT 0:55PHXLauri Korpikoski: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← PHX attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Gordon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXEDM
36Shots on goal43
3.3Expected goals3.7
66Shot attempts68
31Faceoffs won29
7Power plays4
8Penalty minutes14
13Hits26
15Blocked shots14
9Giveaways17
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestBissonnette – Chipchura – Johnson3:06

    xG 0.54–0.13 (81%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Torres – Moss – Gordon9:35

    xG 0.45–0.34 (57%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Doan – Vermette – Boedker10:08

    xG 0.26–0.35 (43%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  4. Sullivan – Lombardi – Korpikoski8:50

    xG 0.22–0.45 (32%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Ekman-Larsson15:16

    xG 1.04–0.42 (71%)attempts 21–13goals 1–0

  2. Klesla – Yandle12:59

    xG 0.89–0.41 (69%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  3. Michalek – Yandle2:12

    xG 0.09–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestBelanger – Eager – Jones6:33

    xG 0.36–0.08 (81%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. VandeVelde – Paajarvi – Yakupov3:00

    xG 0.22–0.07 (76%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Smyth – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins6:33

    xG 0.50–0.37 (57%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  4. Hemsky – Gagner – Paajarvi4:06

    xG 0.05–0.07 (39%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPotter – Fistric11:35

    xG 0.62–0.40 (61%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  2. Fistric – Petry2:26

    xG 0.25–0.03 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Smid – Petry10:21

    xG 0.33–0.29 (53%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.7 xGPHX 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #144 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.04 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).