Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 26, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Florida Panthers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 72% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT08411015434
FLA11231529636

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:57FLATomas KopeckyPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Dmitry Kulikov · Backhand, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:51PITJames NealAssists: Sidney Crosby, Chris Kunitz · Snap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:22FLATomas KopeckyPPAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.43 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:23FLABrian CampbellPPAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Drew Shore · Slap, 0.00 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:54FLAMarcel GocPPAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Tomas Fleischmann · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–4
  6. P2 9:51PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Brooks Orpik, Beau Bennett · Slap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P2 14:08PITPaul MartinAssists: James Neal · Slap, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P2 19:19PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–4
  9. P3 3:29FLATomas FleischmannGWGAssists: Jerred Smithson · Snap, 0.06 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:00FLATomas KopeckyENAssists: Marcel Goc, Erik Gudbranson · Slap, 0.50 xG4–6
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 1:58FLAShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 12:54PITTyler Kennedy: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:19PITMatt Cooke: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 1:31PITBrooks Orpik: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 3:22FLATomas Kopecky: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 3:22FLATomas Kopecky: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 3:22PITTomas Vokoun: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 3:22PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 3:22FLABrian Campbell: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 7:14PITTanner Glass: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P2 8:23PITPascal Dupuis: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P2 11:58PITChris Kunitz: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  13. P2 15:27PITJames Neal: Hooking2 min
  14. P2 18:08FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Interference2 min · PPG
  15. P3 1:19FLATomas Fleischmann: Tripping2 min
  16. P3 7:52FLAScott Timmins: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Shore won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITFLA
34Shots on goal36
3.7Expected goals5.2
69Shot attempts60
30Faceoffs won32
5Power plays7
18Penalty minutes14
29Hits21
16Blocked shots15
2Giveaways4
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Neal11:50

    xG 0.71–0.45 (61%)attempts 18–10goals 2–0

  2. Dupuis – Sutter – Bennett5:04

    xG 0.22–0.09 (71%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Glass – Vitale3:49

    xG 0.11–0.19 (37%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Kennedy – Jeffrey3:56

    xG 0.41–0.61 (40%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Letang6:11

    xG 0.76–0.45 (63%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  2. Orpik – Bortuzzo2:16

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Engelland – Letang4:45

    xG 0.24–0.23 (51%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestMueller – Shore – Huberdeau12:30

    xG 1.62–0.42 (79%)attempts 22–9goals 0–0

  2. Skille – Matthias – Timmins2:02

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Parros – Smithson – Skille2:21

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Smithson – Goc – Fleischmann2:37

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStrachan – Robak9:03

    xG 0.83–0.39 (68%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  2. Kulikov – Gudbranson9:58

    xG 0.75–0.61 (55%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Gudbranson2:08

    xG 0.07–0.06 (54%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 5.2 xGPIT 3.7 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #19 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.20 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 72% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).