Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 2, 2013·Centre Bell, Montreal

Pittsburgh Penguins 7, Montréal Canadiens 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT1143122911736
MTL11231521200639

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:41MTLBrandon PrustAssists: Tomas Kaberle · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:07PITBrandon SutterPPAssists: Kris Letang, Beau Bennett · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:14MTLMax PaciorettyAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Tomas Kaberle · Backhand, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:58PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Deryk Engelland · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:29PITMatt CookeAssists: Brooks Orpik, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:05PITMatt CookeUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P2 17:37MTLBrian GiontaAssists: Francis Bouillon, Lars Eller · Tip-in, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P2 19:59MTLP.K. SubbanAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–4
  9. P3 5:25MTLDavid DesharnaisAssists: Alexei Emelin, Andrei Markov · Wrist, 0.48 xG4–5
  10. P3 8:33PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Slap, 0.06 xG5–5
  11. P3 10:24PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Chris Kunitz · Snap, 0.30 xG6–5
  12. P3 10:54MTLBrian GiontaAssists: Lars Eller, Alexei Emelin · Slap, 0.02 xG6–6
  13. OT 0:52PITBrandon SutterGWGAssists: Simon Despres, James Neal · Wrist, 0.05 xG7–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:20MTLTomas Plekanec: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:30PITPascal Dupuis: Holding2 min
  3. P2 9:01MTLAlex Galchenyuk: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 15:33PITTyler Kennedy: Holding2 min
  5. P3 2:39PITTanner Glass: Interference2 min
  6. P3 2:39MTLColby Armstrong: Holding2 min
  7. P3 12:00PITTyler Kennedy: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITMTL
36Shots on goal39
3.3Expected goals2.6
63Shot attempts60
32Faceoffs won33
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
23Hits22
16Blocked shots14
6Giveaways5
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby14:29

    xG 1.69–0.18 (90%)attempts 20–10goals 3–0

  2. Cooke – Neal – Sutter9:15

    xG 0.65–0.41 (61%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

  3. Kennedy – Jeffrey – Bennett6:57

    xG 0.24–0.12 (66%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  4. Adams – Glass – Vitale4:34

    xG 0.02–0.21 (7%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Despres9:08

    xG 0.72–0.09 (89%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Eaton – Letang3:27

    xG 0.51–0.04 (92%)attempts 5–3goals 1–1

  3. Eaton – Niskanen9:41

    xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestDesharnais – Pacioretty – Gallagher11:20

    xG 1.38–1.14 (55%)attempts 19–15goals 3–3

  2. Gionta – Plekanec – Prust6:17

    xG 0.35–0.23 (61%)attempts 4–5goals 1–1

  3. Ryder – Moen – Plekanec3:00

    xG 0.19–0.08 (70%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Prust – Eller4:26

    xG 0.11–0.12 (49%)attempts 5–2goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaberle – Subban9:13

    xG 0.82–0.15 (85%)attempts 17–5goals 2–0

  2. Markov – Subban2:30

    xG 0.58–0.15 (79%)attempts 11–1goals 1–0

  3. Gorges – Subban2:14

    xG 0.07–0.10 (42%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 2.6 xGPIT 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #1 of 720 this seasonSwing 3.96 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).