Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 7, 2013·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1431216522
PHI41803011432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:18PHIJakub VoracekPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:05PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:06PHIZac RinaldoAssists: Nicklas Grossmann, Max Talbot · Snap, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:17PHIKimmo TimonenAssists: Zac Rinaldo, Ruslan Fedotenko · Snap, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P1 19:52PHIJakub VoracekPPAssists: Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P2 5:30PITPascal DupuisAssists: Sidney Crosby, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–4
  7. P2 8:13PITJames NealAssists: Beau Bennett · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–4
  8. P2 15:47PITTyler KennedyAssists: Matt Cooke, Brandon Sutter · Snap, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. P3 0:18PITChris KunitzGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Pascal Dupuis · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 10:45PITJames Neal: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:18PHIScott Hartnell: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:18PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 11:18PITJames Neal: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 13:06PITMatt Niskanen: Interference2 min
  6. P1 19:44PITJames Neal: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P1 0:00PHIWayne Simmonds: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 0:00PITTanner Glass: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 8:59PHILuke Schenn: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 16:38PHINicklas Grossmann: Interference2 min
  11. P3 10:13PITPascal Dupuis: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
22Shots on goal32
3.3Expected goals1.8
53Shot attempts57
27Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
12Penalty minutes10
22Hits40
16Blocked shots17
10Giveaways10
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby9:29

    xG 0.70–0.18 (79%)attempts 14–10goals 2–1

  2. Malkin – Neal – Bennett10:17

    xG 0.31–0.19 (62%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  3. Adams – Glass – Jeffrey5:10

    xG 0.06–0.02 (78%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Kennedy – Sutter8:49

    xG 0.11–0.08 (58%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Martin16:08

    xG 0.75–0.31 (71%)attempts 15–17goals 2–0

  2. Niskanen – Letang14:58

    xG 0.26–0.17 (60%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Eaton – Engelland9:55

    xG 0.14–0.19 (41%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Giroux – Voracek11:34

    xG 0.30–0.12 (71%)attempts 18–11goals 0–1

  2. Gagne – Read – Couturier6:35

    xG 0.15–0.14 (53%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Fedotenko – Talbot – Rinaldo5:38

    xG 0.03–0.13 (17%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

  4. Brière – Simmonds – Schenn9:51

    xG 0.05–0.33 (13%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Schenn12:06

    xG 0.27–0.16 (63%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

  2. Schenn – Gustafsson2:48

    xG 0.04–0.10 (28%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Coburn – Grossmann13:55

    xG 0.16–0.34 (32%)attempts 6–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 1.8 xGPIT 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #30 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.20 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).