Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 23, 2013·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 74% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ1419010223
NSH4130417524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:11NSHTaylor BeckAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Jonathon Blum · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:21NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Bobby Butler, Martin Erat · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:29CBJR.J. UmbergerPPAssists: Tim Erixon · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P1 9:46NSHDavid LegwandGWGAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Taylor Beck · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–3
  5. P1 10:15NSHMatt HalischukAssists: Bobby Butler, Chris Mueller · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:53CBJArtem AnisimovAssists: Cam Atkinson, Matt Calvert · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:36NSHRoman JosiENAssists: Mike Fisher, Martin Erat · Wrist, 0.68 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:11CBJVinny Prospal: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:28NSHDavid Legwand: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:27NSHRich Clune: Interference5 min
  4. P1 10:27NSHRich Clune: Game misconduct10 min
  5. P1 13:34NSHMike Fisher: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P2 17:06NSHBrandon Yip: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 17:06CBJDerek MacKenzie: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 17:45CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
43% to win57% to win
← CBJ attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Spaling won the faceoff against Anisimov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJNSH
23Shots on goal24
1.3Expected goals2.4
44Shot attempts42
28Faceoffs won40
3Power plays2
9Penalty minutes24
17Hits16
11Blocked shots14
9Giveaways4
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Foligno – Johansen11:51

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  2. Prospal – Brassard – Letestu11:54

    xG 0.34–0.31 (52%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Anisimov – Calvert – Atkinson11:54

    xG 0.11–0.10 (51%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  4. MacKenzie – Boll – Gillies8:20

    xG 0.05–0.36 (12%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Nikitin13:51

    xG 0.35–0.11 (77%)attempts 15–4goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Prout13:25

    xG 0.28–0.31 (47%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Erixon – Moore13:07

    xG 0.20–0.29 (41%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestFisher – Erat – Kostitsyn12:04

    xG 0.53–0.13 (81%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  2. Legwand – Beck – Bourque10:16

    xG 0.58–0.29 (67%)attempts 9–9goals 2–0

  3. Halischuk – Mueller – Butler5:04

    xG 0.17–0.08 (68%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  4. Yip – Spaling – Butler5:01

    xG 0.08–0.03 (72%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi18:55

    xG 0.81–0.20 (80%)attempts 12–13goals 1–1

  2. Gill – Blum10:02

    xG 0.21–0.12 (64%)attempts 6–7goals 2–0

  3. Klein – Bartley16:37

    xG 0.18–0.37 (33%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.4 xGCBJ 1.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #343 of 720 this seasonSwing 0.83 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 74% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).