Tue, Apr 2, 2013·TD Garden, Boston
Ottawa Senators 2, Boston Bruins 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 81% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT | 119 | 013 | 115 | 247 |
| BOS | 222 | 012 | 116 | 350 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 2:48OTTColin GreeningAssists: Zack Smith, Marc Methot · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–0
- P1 3:28BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Zdeno Chara, Milan Lucic · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–1
- P1 4:29BOSTyler SeguinAssists: Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–2
- P3 1:55OTTAndre BenoitAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Mika Zibanejad · Slap, 0.04 xG2–2
- P3 10:21BOSNathan HortonGWGAssists: Milan Lucic, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.41 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 6:05OTTJim O'Brien: Hooking2 min
- P1 8:50BOSAndrew Ference: Closing hand on puck2 min
- P2 2:13OTTJim O'Brien: Hooking2 min
- P2 10:43BOSRich Peverley: Tripping2 min
- P3 2:32OTTMike Hoffman: Closing hand on puck2 min
- P3 19:26BOSJohnny Boychuk: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Hoffman won the faceoff against Seguin
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- Kassian – Condra – O'Brien4:00
xG 0.05–0.07 (42%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
- Alfredsson – Turris – Silfverberg2:22
xG 0.02–0.10 (15%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Neil – Greening – Smith11:31
xG 0.80–0.95 (46%)attempts 25–12goals 1–0
- Alfredsson – Turris – Hoffman8:23
xG 0.33–0.51 (39%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- Gonchar – Wiercioch3:39
xG 0.06–0.05 (56%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
- Benoit – Methot3:28
xG 0.29–0.46 (39%)attempts 6–3goals 1–1
- Phillips – Benoit3:12
xG 0.09–0.30 (24%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestHorton – Krejci – Lucic12:47
xG 0.84–0.45 (65%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1
- Peverley – Marchand – Seguin5:23
xG 0.47–0.11 (81%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1
- Bergeron – Marchand – Seguin4:40
xG 0.61–0.31 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0
- Pandolfo – Peverley – Caron4:00
xG 0.27–0.07 (79%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Hamilton13:13
xG 0.92–0.31 (75%)attempts 23–12goals 1–0
- Seidenberg – Bartkowski4:09
xG 0.44–0.10 (82%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Ference – Seidenberg9:52
xG 0.68–0.49 (58%)attempts 10–21goals 1–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 81% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − OTT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).