Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 7, 2013·Honda Center, Anaheim

Los Angeles Kings 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 55% of the time.

ANA winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK09210116031338
ANA181715023422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:54ANAKyle PalmieriAssists: Matt Beleskey, David Steckel · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:59LAKDrew DoughtyPPAssists: Dustin Brown · Slap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:12ANACorey PerryAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Sheldon Souray · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:30LAKJeff CarterAssists: Mike Richards, Brad Richardson · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:54ANAMatt BeleskeyPPAssists: Sheldon Souray, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:15LAKDustin BrownAssists: Anze Kopitar, Justin Williams · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Bobby Ryan scored
  2. 2. LAK Mike Richards stopped
  3. 3. ANA Saku Koivu scored
  4. 4. LAK Jeff Carter scored
  5. 5. ANA Corey Perry scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:37LAKJarret Stoll: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 5:34ANABobby Ryan: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 5:34LAKDrew Doughty: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 7:54LAKKeaton Ellerby: Interference2 min
  5. P1 12:38ANASheldon Souray: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 0:36LAKKyle Clifford: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 5:43ANAMatthew Lombardi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 4:27LAKJeff Carter: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← LAK attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Richards
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKANA
38Shots on goal22
2.2Expected goals1.9
74Shot attempts36
38Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
36Hits35
6Blocked shots23
6Giveaways10
4Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Brown – Kopitar14:59

    xG 0.93–0.32 (74%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  2. Stoll – Lewis – King11:22

    xG 0.28–0.03 (89%)attempts 15–2goals 0–0

  3. Fraser – Richardson – Nolan7:28

    xG 0.14–0.32 (30%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  4. Carter – Richards – Clifford11:48

    xG 0.16–0.35 (31%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRegehr – Doughty18:40

    xG 0.76–0.30 (72%)attempts 22–5goals 1–1

  2. Muzzin – Doughty2:12

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  3. Muzzin – Ellerby9:53

    xG 0.35–0.30 (54%)attempts 21–4goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Steckel – Beleskey – Etem2:33

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Selanne – Lombardi – Etem8:53

    xG 0.07–0.10 (43%)attempts 1–13goals 0–0

  3. Koivu – Dvorak – Winnik11:32

    xG 0.33–0.36 (48%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Ryan – Cogliano12:04

    xG 0.40–0.51 (44%)attempts 9–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestAllen – Sbisa15:28

    xG 0.52–0.27 (66%)attempts 9–18goals 1–0

  2. Lydman – Fowler16:21

    xG 0.18–0.40 (31%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

  3. Souray – Beauchemin16:02

    xG 0.42–0.99 (30%)attempts 10–25goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 1.9 xGLAK 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANALAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #62 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.66 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 55% of the time.

ANA winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).