Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 10, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ31411504433
BUF1110808127

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:51CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Marian Gaborik, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:50BUFThomas VanekAssists: Steve Ott, Cody Hodgson · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:35CBJNick FolignoGWGAssists: Ryan Johansen, R.J. Umberger · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:48CBJMarian GaborikAssists: Cam Atkinson, Ryan Murray · Slap, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:11CBJBrandon DubinskyAssists: David Savard, Marian Gaborik · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:10BUFPatrick Kaleta: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:10CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:10BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 3:10CBJDalton Prout: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 7:32BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 7:32CBJNick Foligno: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 7:32BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 10:36BUFTyler Myers: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 16:14BUFMarcus Foligno: Interference2 min
  10. P2 16:14BUFMarcus Foligno: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 12:00CBJBlake Comeau: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
48% to win52% to win
← CBJ attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJBUF
33Shots on goal27
2.7Expected goals2.2
51Shot attempts49
28Faceoffs won22
4Power plays1
17Penalty minutes23
18Hits25
14Blocked shots7
6Giveaways5
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Foligno – Johansen10:33

    xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  2. MacKenzie – Boll – Letestu8:51

    xG 0.05–0.10 (35%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Comeau – Anisimov – Calvert10:38

    xG 0.05–0.27 (17%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Gaborik – Dubinsky – Atkinson8:51

    xG 0.90–1.14 (44%)attempts 11–13goals 3–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNikitin – Savard14:18

    xG 0.42–0.21 (67%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Prout13:48

    xG 0.33–0.34 (50%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Wisniewski – Murray13:06

    xG 0.64–0.87 (43%)attempts 6–17goals 3–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Vanek – Hodgson14:53

    xG 1.22–0.54 (69%)attempts 16–15goals 1–1

  2. McCormick – Porter – Kaleta5:47

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno10:04

    xG 0.24–0.40 (38%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  4. Larsson – Flynn – Girgensons7:17

    xG 0.06–0.37 (14%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Ristolainen3:24

    xG 0.71–0.05 (93%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. McBain – Ristolainen5:46

    xG 0.23–0.16 (58%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Pysyk12:48

    xG 0.42–0.41 (51%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGCBJ 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #862 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.81 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).