Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 17, 2013·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 3, Chicago Blackhawks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL1819010011328
CHI1131508030229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:42CHIBrandon PirriAssists: Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:14STLDavid BackesPPAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, Alex Pietrangelo · Tip-in, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:22CHIMarian HossaAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson · Slap, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:13STLAlexander SteenAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, T.J. Oshie · Tip-in, 0.05 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie scored
  3. 3. CHI Jonathan Toews stopped
  4. 4. STL Alexander Steen stopped
  5. 5. CHI Patrick Sharp stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:09CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:42CHIMichal Handzus: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 7:18STLBarret Jackman: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 13:57STLVladimir Sobotka: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 1:30STLBrenden Morrow: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 6:14STLRoman Polak: Boarding2 min
  7. P3 6:14STLRoman Polak: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 6:14STLBarret Jackman: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 6:14CHIBrandon Bollig: Instigator2 min
  10. P3 6:14CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 6:14CHIBrandon Bollig: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 7:33CHIAndrew Shaw: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
28Shots on goal29
1.8Expected goals1.9
48Shot attempts53
30Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes23
24Hits26
14Blocked shots12
3Giveaways9
9Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBerglund – Tarasenko – Schwartz6:54

    xG 0.36–0.09 (79%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Steen – Backes – Oshie7:30

    xG 0.29–0.10 (74%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Roy – Stewart – Paajarvi2:02

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Sobotka – Reaves – Paajarvi3:43

    xG 0.05–0.06 (47%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo16:44

    xG 0.47–0.23 (67%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. Leopold – Shattenkirk9:57

    xG 0.29–0.13 (69%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Pietrangelo2:21

    xG 0.16–0.02 (89%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Toews – Shaw3:24

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Bickell – Toews – Kane9:22

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Kruger – Bollig – Nordstrom5:55

    xG 0.06–0.07 (48%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Kane – Pirri – Saad2:27

    xG 0.01–0.09 (14%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrookbank – Keith2:06

    xG 0.14–0.01 (91%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook17:53

    xG 0.36–0.42 (46%)attempts 16–12goals 1–1

  3. Brookbank – Leddy11:26

    xG 0.23–0.46 (34%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 1.9 xGSTL 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #473 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).